Springboks (22) 46 / 10 (10) World XV (Final Score)
The South African Springboks and World XV did battle in an International match at
DHL Newlands, Cape Town at 17:00 SA Time (15:00 GMT).
This was the live match discussion Article.
The match was broadcast LIVE on SuperSport 1 & M-Net on TV in SA.
*******************
Scorers:
Springboks:
- Penalties – Handré Pollard (1)
- Drop Goals – 0
- Tries – Damian de Allende (2), Eben Etzebeth (1), Willie le Roux (3), Cobus Reinach (1)
- Conversions – Handré Pollard (2), Pat Lambie (2)
Word XV:
- Penalties – Mike Harris (1)
- Drop Goals – 0
- Tries – Craig Burden (1)
- Conversions – Mike Harris (1)
Teams:
South African Springboks |
World XV |
11 July at 17:00 SA Time | |
|
|
Referee: John Lacey (Ireland)
Assistant Referees: Marius van der Westhuizen (South Africa), Jason Jaftha (South Africa)
TMO: Deon van Blommestein (South Africa)
Always sucks losing no matter who we lose too they all hurt equally bad, but to conpare losing in a range of “bad to worse” sucks.
Conpetitive 😆
@ Stormersboy:
😆
nortie wrote:
Miskien het hulle die wedstryd en reeks ge-Hansie?
Die odds moes goed gewees het
@ Victoriabok:
Now you’re talking!!!
BrumbiesBoy wrote:
Match fixing is die norm daar waar die ouens sandals by hulle suits dra is
Victoriabok wrote:
Durban?
@ nortie:
@ Victoriabok: my feeling exactly VB. Some (like Skoppie for ie.) used to be totally over the top. However, he certainly added colour to our previous life and, aside from that, always contributed a useful insight and alternative view to the average stereotype. I enjoyed our discussions.
nortie wrote:
Nee ek praat van ‘n suit, nie ‘n Safari Pak nie
@ IAAS: Whilst I have a lot of respect for GB for this site’s creation and the manner and spirit in which we interact, I agree, the response to Nama was totally out of court and out of character I’d think. I had to read it twice to confirm its reality. Then I suspected the ‘bear with a sore head’ condition. I’d be most surprised and disappointed if an apology wasn’t forthcoming.
@ IAAS: agree on both points.
@ Tassies:
Hi Tassies,
The manner in which Nama was addressed was not only out of court. It was downright disgusting.
Nama was just conducting a normal debate on a rugby forum. We all know that there are transformation issues to be measured against. No secret there. So what if he mentioned that black Boks are mostly picked at loosehead or on the wings/fullback. That is the truth.
And he was very much against a black Bok being picked ahead of an in-form white guy. He even called it windowdressing, which he doesn’t buy into. Where’s the political posturing there?
Yet all of a sudden Nama has political issues. What utter garbage.
Users Online
Total 438 users including 0 member, 438 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,828,733 Page Impressions
_