South Africa and the West Indies battled each other in the 3rd and last 5-Day Cricket Test at Newlands, Cape Town. The Test ran from 2 to 6 January 2015.
The 2nd Test in Port Elizabeth was a bit of a disapointment, with wet weather spoiling the Test and forcing a draw. Better weather was expected and delivered in Cape Town for the 3rd Test.
Play started on schedule on Day 1, at 10:30 SA Time (08:30 GMT).
The score cards were updated at regular intervals, here on Rugby-Talk.com.
The West Indies won the toss and elected to bat.
The first West Indies wicket fell with their score on 30. At Lunch on Day 1 the West Indies were on 80 / 2 after 27 overs and at Stumps on Day 1 the West Indies were 276 / 6, after the day’s 90 overs.
The Proteas wrapped up the West Indies tail relatively quickly on Day 2 (within 9.5 overs), with the West Indies all out for 329 after 99.5 overs. The Proteas started batting and lost the wicket of Dean Elgar at 48 / 1. At Tea on Day 2 the Proteas were 135 / 2, after 42 overs. With the Proteas on 227 / 3, rain interrupted play… which should lead to Stumps – Day 2.
On Day 3 the Proteas resumed batting and lost the wicket of Hashim Amla on 63, with the Proteas on 254 / 4. Proteas were on 313 / 5 at Lunch – Day 3, still 16 runs behind. AB de Villiers easily reached his TON after Lunch on Day 3 and eventually perished on 148 as he tried to hit it out of the park. Proteas lead by 92 at the Innings break, having scored 421 All Out.
The West Indies 2nd Innings started off well for them and after the first 10.5 overs they were on 23 / 0 before Morné Morkel struck, making it 23 / 1 after 11 overs. The 2nd wicket fell shortly afterwards, on 27. The West Indies soldiered on and were 88 / 2 at Stumps – Day 3.
Morning Day 4… it is raining and the outfield is soaked. Prospects of play did not look good for the rest of Day 4. Play eventually resumed at 15:00 on Day 4. The West Indies hung in for most of the afternoon, till the wickets started falling rather fast, losing the last 7 wickets for just 33 runs. West Indies All Out for 215 in their 2nd Innings, a lead of 123. This leaves the Proteas needing 124 for the win, with a Day and a few overs remaining in the Test. Alviro Petersen falls without troubling the scorecard, with the Proteas on 9 / 1 after 2.3 Overs, as Stumps was called on Day 4.
The Proteas needed 115 runs for the win on Day 5 of the Test and lost the wicket of Faf du Plessis with the score on 51 / 2, leaving 73 runs to win. South Africa won the Test before Lunch on the final Day, a win by 8 wickets.
West Indies:
First Innings – 329 All Out (99.5 Overs)
Second Innings – 215 All Out (79.5 Overs)
South Africa:
First Innings – 421 All Out (122.4 Overs)
Second Innings – 124 / 2 (37.4 Overs)
South Africa won by 8 wickets
West Indies 1st innings | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KC Brathwaite | c Elgar b Steyn | 7 | 58 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 20.00 | |
DS Smith | b Harmer | 47 | 119 | 86 | 8 | 0 | 54.65 | |
LR Johnson | lbw b Harmer | 54 | 109 | 84 | 9 | 0 | 64.28 | |
MN Samuels | c du Plessis b van Zyl | 43 | 106 | 70 | 6 | 0 | 61.42 | |
S Chanderpaul | st †de Villiers b Harmer | 9 | 72 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 18.75 | |
J Blackwood | lbw b Steyn | 56 | 168 | 113 | 6 | 0 | 49.55 | |
D Ramdin*† | c & b Steyn | 53 | 113 | 103 | 6 | 0 | 51.45 | |
JO Holder | c van Zyl b Steyn | 23 | 52 | 34 | 4 | 0 | 67.64 | |
JE Taylor | c Steyn b Morkel | 13 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 108.33 | |
SJ Benn | c Bavuma b Morkel | 5 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 45.45 | |
ST Gabriel | not out | 4 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 80.00 | |
Extras | (lb 5, w 8, nb 2) | 15 | ||||||
Total | (all out; 99.5 overs; 424 mins) | 329 | (3.29 runs per over) |
Fall of wickets: 1-30 (Brathwaite, 13.2 ov), 2-80 (Smith, 26.6 ov), 3-131 (Johnson, 38.3 ov), 4-162 (Samuels, 51.1 ov), 5-172 (Chanderpaul, 56.1 ov), 6-266 (Ramdin, 85.2 ov), 7-299 (Blackwood, 94.1 ov), 8-316 (Holder, 96.3 ov), 9-319 (Taylor, 97.1 ov), 10-329 (Benn, 99.5 ov)
Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | 0s | 4s | 6s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DW Steyn | 25 | 6 | 78 | 4 | 3.12 | 119 | 9 | 0 | (3w) | |
VD Philander | 19 | 2 | 73 | 0 | 3.84 | 83 | 12 | 0 | (1nb) | |
M Morkel | 19.5 | 1 | 83 | 2 | 4.18 | 81 | 12 | 0 | (1nb, 1w) | |
SR Harmer | 26 | 5 | 71 | 3 | 2.73 | 120 | 10 | 0 | ||
S van Zyl | 8 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 1.62 | 38 | 1 | 0 | ||
D Elgar | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3.00 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
South Africa 1st innings | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AN Petersen | run out (Blackwood) | 42 | 130 | 85 | 3 | 1 | 49.41 | |
D Elgar | lbw b Holder | 8 | 58 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 26.66 | |
F du Plessis | st †Ramdin b Benn | 68 | 150 | 122 | 8 | 0 | 55.73 | |
HM Amla* | c †Ramdin b Holder | 63 | 189 | 150 | 7 | 0 | 42.00 | |
AB de Villiers† | c Gabriel b Samuels | 148 | 323 | 194 | 15 | 1 | 76.28 | |
T Bavuma | b Gabriel | 15 | 53 | 41 | 2 | 0 | 36.58 | |
S van Zyl | lbw b Samuels | 33 | 91 | 63 | 3 | 0 | 52.38 | |
VD Philander | run out (Holder/Benn) | 0 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
SR Harmer | lbw b Taylor | 10 | 37 | 48 | 2 | 0 | 20.83 | |
DW Steyn | run out (Johnson) | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
M Morkel | not out | 4 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 80.00 | |
Extras | (lb 7, w 13, nb 10) | 30 | ||||||
Total | (all out; 122.4 overs; 521 mins) | 421 | (3.43 runs per over) |
Fall of wickets: 1-48 (Elgar, 11.5 ov), 2-104 (Petersen, 27.1 ov), 3-157 (du Plessis, 49.1 ov), 4-254 (Amla, 75.1 ov), 5-288 (Bavuma, 86.5 ov), 6-384 (van Zyl, 108.2 ov), 7-385 (Philander, 109.4 ov), 8-404 (Harmer, 119.5 ov), 9-408 (Steyn, 120.4 ov), 10-421 (de Villiers, 122.4 ov)
Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | 0s | 4s | 6s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JE Taylor | 20 | 2 | 80 | 1 | 4.00 | 83 | 9 | 0 | (1nb, 1w) | |
ST Gabriel | 17 | 2 | 64 | 1 | 3.76 | 70 | 3 | 0 | (7nb, 3w) | |
JO Holder | 24 | 4 | 87 | 2 | 3.62 | 107 | 12 | 0 | (2nb, 1w) | |
MN Samuels | 16.4 | 0 | 68 | 2 | 4.08 | 68 | 8 | 1 | ||
SJ Benn | 45 | 9 | 115 | 1 | 2.55 | 202 | 9 | 1 |
West Indies 2nd innings | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KC Brathwaite | b Harmer | 16 | 64 | 45 | 1 | 0 | 35.55 | |
DS Smith | c †de Villiers b Morkel | 7 | 50 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 19.44 | |
LR Johnson | c Amla b Morkel | 44 | 112 | 76 | 6 | 0 | 57.89 | |
MN Samuels | c Elgar b Harmer | 74 | 225 | 150 | 9 | 2 | 49.33 | |
S Chanderpaul | run out (Bavuma) | 50 | 203 | 113 | 5 | 0 | 44.24 | |
J Blackwood | b Steyn | 13 | 35 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 50.00 | |
D Ramdin*† | c Harmer b Steyn | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
JO Holder | c Amla b Harmer | 2 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 12.50 | |
JE Taylor | c Elgar b Harmer | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
SJ Benn | c †de Villiers b Steyn | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
ST Gabriel | not out | 2 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 20.00 | |
Extras | (b 4, lb 3) | 7 | ||||||
Total | (all out; 79.5 overs; 355 mins) | 215 | (2.69 runs per over) |
Fall of wickets: 1-23 (Smith, 10.6 ov), 2-27 (Brathwaite, 13.5 ov), 3-95 (Johnson, 36.5 ov), 4-182 (Samuels, 64.5 ov), 5-202 (Blackwood, 71.6 ov), 6-204 (Ramdin, 73.1 ov), 7-213 (Holder, 76.3 ov), 8-213 (Taylor, 76.5 ov), 9-213 (Benn, 77.4 ov), 10-215 (Chanderpaul, 79.5 ov)
Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | 0s | 4s | 6s | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DW Steyn | 23.5 | 3 | 75 | 3 | 3.14 | 110 | 11 | 0 | |
VD Philander | 16 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 1.68 | 81 | 1 | 0 | |
M Morkel | 14 | 7 | 18 | 2 | 1.28 | 74 | 2 | 0 | |
SR Harmer | 24 | 7 | 82 | 4 | 3.41 | 106 | 9 | 2 | |
S van Zyl | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3.00 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
South Africa 2nd innings (target: 124 runs) | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D Elgar | not out | 60 | 103 | 7 | 1 | 58.25 | ||
AN Petersen | b Benn | 0 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
F du Plessis | c Blackwood b Benn | 14 | 77 | 69 | 2 | 0 | 20.28 | |
HM Amla* | not out | 38 | 49 | 6 | 0 | 77.55 | ||
Extras | (b 8, lb 2, nb 2) | 12 | ||||||
Total | (2 wickets; 37.4 overs) | 124 | (3.29 runs per over) |
Did not bat: AB de Villiers†, T Bavuma, S van Zyl, VD Philander, DW Steyn, M Morkel, SR Harmer
Fall of wickets: 1-9 (Petersen, 2.3 ov), 2-51 (du Plessis, 22.5 ov)
Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | 0s | 4s | 6s | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JE Taylor | 7 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 2.85 | 34 | 3 | 0 | ||
MN Samuels | 3.4 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 6.54 | 11 | 4 | 0 | ||
SJ Benn | 17 | 8 | 24 | 2 | 1.41 | 89 | 1 | 1 | ||
JO Holder | 5 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 3.80 | 23 | 3 | 0 | ||
ST Gabriel | 5 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 5.40 | 20 | 4 | 0 | (2nb) |
Match details
Player of the match – tba
TV umpire – BF Bowden (New Zealand)
Match referee – RS Madugalle (Sri Lanka)
Reserve umpire – JD Cloete
Close of play
- – day 1 – West Indies 1st innings 276/6 (J Blackwood 45*, JO Holder 5*, 90 ov)
- – day 2 – South Africa 1st innings 227/3 (HM Amla 55*, AB de Villiers 32*, 68.3 ov)
- – day 3 – West Indies 2nd innings 88/2 (LR Johnson 37*, MN Samuels 26*, 34 ov)
- – day 4 – South Africa 2nd innings 9/1 (D Elgar 5*, 2.3 ov)
Match Notes – Day 5
- South Africa: 50 runs in 21.5 overs (131 balls), Extras 5
- Drinks: South Africa – 51/2 in 22.5 overs (D Elgar 32)
- Over 29.4: Review by West Indies (Bowling), Umpire – PR Reiffel, Batsman – HM Amla (Struck down)
- D Elgar: 50 off 86 balls (6 x 4, 1 x 6)
- South Africa: 100 runs in 34.6 overs (212 balls), Extras 12
- 3rd Wicket: 50 runs in 78 balls (D Elgar 22, HM Amla 24, Ex 7)
New ball taken – nice hard plum on a flat pitch with average bowlers – come on lads, time to make hay!!!
Elegant stroke play from Bavuma
60 @ Just For Kicks:
The thing is, he seems to be there for his batting only… he’s not a great or extraordinary fielder, does not bowl… so then he HAS TO perform with the bat, and solidly so too, otherwise he is superfluous to requirements!
Sorry – thought the new ball taken, but put back in Aleem’s pocket. Strange, the WI obviously think Bavuma has a weakness against spin. Cant think of any other reason not to take it from their part. Bavuma still new to the crease. Surely the new ball would pose more risk to the new batsman???
63 @ grootblousmile:We have to be honest, he is there because of his colour. I have no problem with him being a specialist batsman, as long as he IS one, and the team don’t have to carry him.
64 @ Just For Kicks:
I also never understand why a team would not immediately take the New Ball.
It immediately provides them something else in their armoury to attack with…
Now the New Ball is taken, after 83 overs gone!
65 @ Just For Kicks:
Yeah, exactly my feelings.
No place for passengers… or for discrimination…
Let’s see what he does here!
He certainly played that short ball a bit better than the last test. He now has his highest score in Test cricket!
69 @ Just For Kicks:
If he’d hit that short ball a bit fuller he would have been caught in the deep.
He seems a bit iffy and vulnerable to me.
Bavuma seems to be getting some rhythm now… and as I say it he edges one which drops just short… luckily also a no-ball!
Eish… next one not a good shot either, could easily have edged that one to the keeper.
Bavuma out next ball, chopped it on… for only 15.
Bavuma therefor fails in my estimation!
Proteas 288 / 5
And Bavumas stay has ended. Too bad, as he looked as if he was just starting to get some confidence.\
Bavuma b Gabriel 15 SA288/5
The next newbie in, Stiaan van Zyl, in front of his home crowd… in only his 3rd Test.
… at least he bowls too…
75 @ grootblousmile:…and a massive batting average!!!!! If he gets any where near that today, SA will be in the pound seats!
Eish, thats was a loose shot from vZyl
Pitch seems to be getting difficult to navigate, hey!
A number of balls keeping very low
AB, the first player of the test to get into the 70’s. He’s broken the curse, and can now go on to score freely.
79 @ Just For Kicks:
Here’s hoping AB gets most of the strike!
78 @ grootblousmile:…and those cracks are just going to get bigger. Thus it is imperative that SA bat just once.
81 @ Just For Kicks:
Yip, you don’t want to bat on Day 5, not on this pitch!
Blomme almost needs to double their current score…
SA get to 300
Jeeeez, Stiaan van Zyl also looking very iffy at the moment!
… although, if Van Zyl could just battle past these early stages, he could go on big, like in the 1st Test…
85 @ grootblousmile:Looked much better with that drive!
Van Zyl leaving many balls… seems he is very aware where his stumps are and what to leave… that is a good sign.
Then again, I often measure a batsman on how he goes early in his innings… and Van Zyl needs to buck it up a few notches.
He hits an excellent 4…
Must be almost lunch time. Been a good mornings cricket.
Problem is, these days the opposition work you out rather quickly, so if you are vulnerable early on, then expect it to get worse… as your weaknesses are exploited in further matches.
Same with rugby, the 1-year wonders often fail in their 2nd year, as opposition is aware what their strenghts and weaknesses are…
Users Online
Total 170 users including 0 member, 170 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,337,381 Page Impressions
_