Jonathan Kaplan
This weekend saw the finale of The Rugby Championship and we saw two very contrasting games. The All Blacks won the trophy… again. Deservedly.
The Pumas won their first ever fixture in this tournament, a historical moment and one they will never forget… I certainly won’t, but the highlight had to be the bromance in the coaches box after the game where their Latin exuberance, warmth and hot blooded nature got the better of some of them… Put it this way, there was lots of lovin!!
Rate the Ref
The Springboks finally beat the All Blacks after coming quite close over the past couple of years.
From a parochial SA viewpoint it was a great win. Even, I suspect from a neutrals point of view, it was good to see a team challenge the best team, and beat them. There wasn’t much to choose between the teams, and the respect between the players and coaching staff is evident for all to see.
It is a beautiful thing of the sport of rugby union and one which we should cherish, as it doesn’t permeate through all sporting codes!
The Boks dominated the first half, the All Blacks the second. In the end, the game came down to a decision by the TV producer to highlight a misdemeanor by Liam Messam on Schalk Burger, which all the officials missed in real time. After finding the clip, and then replaying it over and over, eventually the Television Match Officials decided it was worthy of review, and correctly awarded a penalty to the Boks, which Pat Lambie (who has oodles of BMT) converted to win the game.
The TMO himself seemed a bit confused by referring to the fact that he thought perhaps arms were used in the tackle which was hardly the point. It was a swinging arm and a dangerous tackle.
If you are a Bok supporter, you will be saying we deserved it, and how many times it happened against us.
The protocol and process will mean nothing. But there is an important point to make here. I doubt (very much) whether that clip would have been brought up on the screen by producers in Australia or New Zealand and replayed over and over.
Is it right that someone outside of the domain of the match officials can affect the outcome of a major test match? And how neutral is he? In the end, it was his alertness that drew the attention of the crowd to the high tackle, they got into it, the officials then decided to take a look, and the resultant penalty determined the outcome.
I thought Wayne Barnes had a decent match. He walks a lot. He talks a lot.
And I wasn’t that impressed when he penalized Jan Serfontein for not rolling away when he could not (unplayable was the right call) or Jannie du Plessis for side entry on the All Black line when his action had no influence on the play at all (he attempted a clean and missed his target) or the resets of scrums when Franks’ feet are so far back on the touch, that he is almost certainly hanging over the cliff (not supporting his own body weight) and the last penalty… A brave call! BUT, he let the game flow with the right amount of empathy and game management. He was even handed in his approach.
He is a superior communicator. And he is smart!
He showed his experience in this toughest of environments when the reffing in this tournament has been quite ordinary, and deserves credit for that (and he was excellent at my braai on Tuesday with his singing of “Bye bye miss American pie”. So much for those people who regularly say the Northern referees are not up to it!
Argentina vs Australia:
Argentina beat Australia 21 – 17 after being down 0 – 14. They worked hard for this win, and worked hard for each other in the fixture. Their carry was excellent and they seemed to get rewards when they were in the Australian half.
Their tries were well constructed and I am really happy for them that they have finally won a game. Hopefully they will become even more competitive in the years to come and win an away game or two.
Australia will bemoan the fact that they let slip a biggish lead, but the real story will perhaps be the 3 Yellow Cards that the Wallabies received on match day.
Last week I was singing Nigel Owens’ praises after the match at Newlands. He has really shot to the fore after the 2011 Rugby World Cup in New Zealand but I thought he was poor on Saturday.
He was strangely hesitant in his decision making, once even asking the Assistant Referee whether there were hands in, after he penalized Australia and had pulled his Cards out already. He then put the cards back in his pocket. What was the point?
Not so lucky was the Australian No 9, Nick Phipps, who received a Yellow Card for a brilliant piece of play where he was the tackler and didn’t infringe at all.
What should have been a turnover to Australia, resulted in a Yellow Card which was a disaster for the Wallabies who then conceded a penalty and a try in his absence. Not great!! They would have been spitting mad as that decision had huge consequences for this test match.
Towards the end of the fixture, with the game still in the balance, the referee stopped the game when Hooper attempted a charge down, was airborne and in the process fell on top of Sanchez, the kicker.
He was also carded (incorrectly, as there was little he could do once he was airborne). Argentina converted the penalty and wound the clock down to record a historical moment for them and the tournament.
My opinion of Nigel hasn’t changed.
To say he was poor would be an understatement, but I know from personal experience that we all have these days (I had my fair share), and he will bounce back. I do feel for the Wallabies though and I thought they deserved better.
The Currie Cup:
On the Currie Cup front, the Blue Bulls dominated the Pumas in Nelspruit, where Peyps (Jaco Peyper) had an excellent game.
They are back in the mix! The Free State Cheetahs were very stiff against WP, who somehow managed to hack through a loose ball and fall on it.
To be honest, they shouldn’t have had a prayer at that stage of the game. Sarel Pretorius had a brain fart by taking a quick throw when his team were in the ascendency, instead of slowing everything down and winding the clock down.
That was far too adventurous for that stage of the game and perhaps ended up costing them the game. I still think he is a champion though!
Griquas predictably smashed the EP Kings 45-25, as I thought they might. Quite simply, they are tougher and want it more.
It was a happy and sad night for Jacques Botes, the most capped player in the history of the Currie Cup.
It was perhaps his last home game and he was given a rousing send-off by the crowd and by his fellow team mates. He is a model professional and a genuinely good guy.
He made a huge contribution to the game and earned his respect from teammates and opponents alike. He will be remembered as a workhorse who had an uncanny knack of appearing at the right place at the right time, scoring an inordinate amount of tries for a loose forward!
I thought Pro Legoate had a tough time on the night.
He looked ill at ease and flustered and most of the calls appeared to go the way of the home team.
The decision to card Derick Minnie with about 14 minutes to go was completely inaccurate as he complied totally with law.
Pro could not have seen the incident clearly and the net result was that the Golden Lions were reduced to 14 players for the remainder of the game, barring the last 2 minutes. I feel for Pro as he is one of the genuinely good guys on the circuit, but that effort simply is not enough at this level.
The Rugby Championship referee wrap up:
I have had a good look at the Referees in The Rugby Championship and think they will concede that there is much room for growth, even the best of them had an off day, so I will say the alarm bells are ringing, but not sure if anyone is listening… Yet!
My top 3 performances were :
- Nigel Owens – South Africa vs Australia at Newlands
- Jerome Garces – New Zealand vs South Africa in Wellington
- Craig Joubert – Argentina vs New Zealand in Buenos Aires
- I thought Gauzere (New Zealand vs Argentina), Clancy (Australia vs South Africa) and Owens (Argentina vs Australia) had off days.
Is it not time for a revamp of the system to help these moments where referees are not having good days at the office?
@ MacroBlouBul:
Thanks a lot. It is a penalty for sure but if the producers were kiwi fans they might not have been so “helpful” and the boks most likely would have lost and therein lies the problem imo. .
@ robzim:
Currently the TMO sits in isolation with one monitor in front of him. He therefor is dependent on what the producer shows to him. Maybe if he sits in the production van where there are multiple monitors, it will then be up to HIM to decide which clip to show if a decision needs to be made.
How many times have we seen that producers in NZ cannot “find” a clip and then the TMO just has to accept that and relay the message to the ref on the field. If he was in the production van, he could’ve seen it for himself from the multiple monitors and make the call without relying on someone else’s (probably a biased home supporter in any case) word.
@ robzim:
Yep no doubt they would not have shown it, it might not have been shown on neutral grounds either, but when it is it is still up to the referee to decide.
212 @ Nama:
This is the right way forward I think.
What does a TMO do for 70-80 minutes anyway when not called upon?
210 @ MacroBlouBul:
Great footage!
I see just ONE REPLAY on the Big Screen before the Referee was asked to have a look by Jean de Villiers and then decides to indeed have a look.
The continued Replays thereafter was for the sake of the TMO and Referee to make the adjudication on the incident…. as is ALWAYS the case.
NO OVERUSE of the Television Producer at all… ONE REPLAY in accordance of what must appear on the Big Screen anyway in a game, and THEN the rest for the TMO and Referee to adjudicate.
Nothing wrong, whatsoever!
Great decision in the end and Messam was lucky not to cop a Yellow to boot!
I wonder when Pieter van Zyl got a job at DStv?
The moral of the story is to not make tip tackles or tackle high, least of all to shoulder someone in the face.
@ Nama:
Good point. Who would have thought that a stupid game of rugby can ever get so complicated 🙂
most of all
@ robzim:
With more and more money coming into it, it’s only going to get more complicated, I think.
Well, according to Andre Watson it was the TMO that called it and not the producers. This is from an article on iol
@ leon:
Would be great if we could get that info in an IRB press release.
@ MacroBlouBul:
yes it would. But guess we will never get all the facts.
@ Nama:
Incorrect.
The “howls of protest ” after Eden park last year was not because of what was show on the big screen but rather because the referee chose to ignore what he saw there “I’ve already made up my mind”.
As for big Verns ball tampering incident I believe the biggest moaners where the SA coaching staff.
Slightly different situation because I believe the production company was not a home team one but one that covers a lot of The Proteas overseas games.
Remember your favourite Faf also got done in the Emirares.
😆
@ leon:
Andre stated that he is not “sure” the producers found it. It does not mean anything. Barry or Gerrie will have a field day with him.
macro @ 222
exactly!!
robzim @ 225
Does anyone notice that it is the same glass half empty crew that seems to be crying about this.
Makes you think dunnit?
😆
ok, it would be a good thing if what andre said is true
but
why was it shown on the big screen before the officials asked to see it then?
that cant be “following protocols’ ?
@ Ashley:
Regardless of what Watson says, we have HOURS of big screen footage in a season anyway, its no huge conspiracy that there are replays on a big screen, surely?
@ gunther:
En dan moet hy probeer om ‘n stekie in te kry…met die smilie aan die einde natuurlik.
Ek weet nie hoekom jy Faf moes opbring nie, maar nouja. Wat anders kan ‘n mens van jou verwag. 😉
Feit van die saak is dat daar Suid Afrikaners was (nie ALMAL nie) wat gekla het oor die Philander kwessie…net soos daar nou Kiwis is (nie ALMAL nie) wat kla oor die Messam kwessie. Ek sien nie die verskil nie.
@ robzim:
Barry will probably put to him that his timeline doesn’t make sense and that TMO he heard must have been from a women in the crowd.
@ gunther:
The “howls of protest ” after Ellis Park on Saturday is not because of what was shown on the big screen but because of “who” decided to repeatedly show what was shown. 😉
@ Ashley@229:
I don’t think we hear all the communication from the TMO to the ref. They might only switch it on after the ref asked the TMO for review. But i’m only guessing.
@ Nama:
Like I said they’ve being doing it in Kiwiland for ages seems like it’s only upsetting you now.
Wrong team won.
😆
@ gunther:
No, my team won.
Two wrongs make a right now? 😀
@ Nama:
Incorrect again.
There was very little response to The Vernon incident the most outspoken were the coaching staff.
I mentioned faf because that was the previous incident where the same production company was involved.
Geddit?
😆
@ Nama
Ja you seem delighted.
😆
It’s just odd that you only get excited about it now.
Just a coincidence I guess hey.
😆
@ gunther:
The Faf incident was different afa I can remember. The umpires requested to see some footage from the producer of suspicious behaviour by Faf.
In the Philander incident, the production company approached the umpires during a break/at the end of the day with footage of suspicious behaviour by the player.
You would so like to put me in a box that suits you, won’t you? 😆
macro @ 230
the earliest articles and discussions around the issue was that it was shown repeatedly while play was still going on.
the big screen is mostly used to show rugby and boobies and boobies and rugby and allow guys in the stadion to follow LIVE play, especially when its a bit far away from where you’re sitting.
Users Online
Total 364 users including 0 member, 364 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 40,015,927 Page Impressions
_