Jonathan Kaplan
This weekend saw the finale of The Rugby Championship and we saw two very contrasting games. The All Blacks won the trophy… again. Deservedly.
The Pumas won their first ever fixture in this tournament, a historical moment and one they will never forget… I certainly won’t, but the highlight had to be the bromance in the coaches box after the game where their Latin exuberance, warmth and hot blooded nature got the better of some of them… Put it this way, there was lots of lovin!!
Rate the Ref
The Springboks finally beat the All Blacks after coming quite close over the past couple of years.
From a parochial SA viewpoint it was a great win. Even, I suspect from a neutrals point of view, it was good to see a team challenge the best team, and beat them. There wasn’t much to choose between the teams, and the respect between the players and coaching staff is evident for all to see.
It is a beautiful thing of the sport of rugby union and one which we should cherish, as it doesn’t permeate through all sporting codes!
The Boks dominated the first half, the All Blacks the second. In the end, the game came down to a decision by the TV producer to highlight a misdemeanor by Liam Messam on Schalk Burger, which all the officials missed in real time. After finding the clip, and then replaying it over and over, eventually the Television Match Officials decided it was worthy of review, and correctly awarded a penalty to the Boks, which Pat Lambie (who has oodles of BMT) converted to win the game.
The TMO himself seemed a bit confused by referring to the fact that he thought perhaps arms were used in the tackle which was hardly the point. It was a swinging arm and a dangerous tackle.
If you are a Bok supporter, you will be saying we deserved it, and how many times it happened against us.
The protocol and process will mean nothing. But there is an important point to make here. I doubt (very much) whether that clip would have been brought up on the screen by producers in Australia or New Zealand and replayed over and over.
Is it right that someone outside of the domain of the match officials can affect the outcome of a major test match? And how neutral is he? In the end, it was his alertness that drew the attention of the crowd to the high tackle, they got into it, the officials then decided to take a look, and the resultant penalty determined the outcome.
I thought Wayne Barnes had a decent match. He walks a lot. He talks a lot.
And I wasn’t that impressed when he penalized Jan Serfontein for not rolling away when he could not (unplayable was the right call) or Jannie du Plessis for side entry on the All Black line when his action had no influence on the play at all (he attempted a clean and missed his target) or the resets of scrums when Franks’ feet are so far back on the touch, that he is almost certainly hanging over the cliff (not supporting his own body weight) and the last penalty… A brave call! BUT, he let the game flow with the right amount of empathy and game management. He was even handed in his approach.
He is a superior communicator. And he is smart!
He showed his experience in this toughest of environments when the reffing in this tournament has been quite ordinary, and deserves credit for that (and he was excellent at my braai on Tuesday with his singing of “Bye bye miss American pie”. So much for those people who regularly say the Northern referees are not up to it!
Argentina vs Australia:
Argentina beat Australia 21 – 17 after being down 0 – 14. They worked hard for this win, and worked hard for each other in the fixture. Their carry was excellent and they seemed to get rewards when they were in the Australian half.
Their tries were well constructed and I am really happy for them that they have finally won a game. Hopefully they will become even more competitive in the years to come and win an away game or two.
Australia will bemoan the fact that they let slip a biggish lead, but the real story will perhaps be the 3 Yellow Cards that the Wallabies received on match day.
Last week I was singing Nigel Owens’ praises after the match at Newlands. He has really shot to the fore after the 2011 Rugby World Cup in New Zealand but I thought he was poor on Saturday.
He was strangely hesitant in his decision making, once even asking the Assistant Referee whether there were hands in, after he penalized Australia and had pulled his Cards out already. He then put the cards back in his pocket. What was the point?
Not so lucky was the Australian No 9, Nick Phipps, who received a Yellow Card for a brilliant piece of play where he was the tackler and didn’t infringe at all.
What should have been a turnover to Australia, resulted in a Yellow Card which was a disaster for the Wallabies who then conceded a penalty and a try in his absence. Not great!! They would have been spitting mad as that decision had huge consequences for this test match.
Towards the end of the fixture, with the game still in the balance, the referee stopped the game when Hooper attempted a charge down, was airborne and in the process fell on top of Sanchez, the kicker.
He was also carded (incorrectly, as there was little he could do once he was airborne). Argentina converted the penalty and wound the clock down to record a historical moment for them and the tournament.
My opinion of Nigel hasn’t changed.
To say he was poor would be an understatement, but I know from personal experience that we all have these days (I had my fair share), and he will bounce back. I do feel for the Wallabies though and I thought they deserved better.
The Currie Cup:
On the Currie Cup front, the Blue Bulls dominated the Pumas in Nelspruit, where Peyps (Jaco Peyper) had an excellent game.
They are back in the mix! The Free State Cheetahs were very stiff against WP, who somehow managed to hack through a loose ball and fall on it.
To be honest, they shouldn’t have had a prayer at that stage of the game. Sarel Pretorius had a brain fart by taking a quick throw when his team were in the ascendency, instead of slowing everything down and winding the clock down.
That was far too adventurous for that stage of the game and perhaps ended up costing them the game. I still think he is a champion though!
Griquas predictably smashed the EP Kings 45-25, as I thought they might. Quite simply, they are tougher and want it more.
It was a happy and sad night for Jacques Botes, the most capped player in the history of the Currie Cup.
It was perhaps his last home game and he was given a rousing send-off by the crowd and by his fellow team mates. He is a model professional and a genuinely good guy.
He made a huge contribution to the game and earned his respect from teammates and opponents alike. He will be remembered as a workhorse who had an uncanny knack of appearing at the right place at the right time, scoring an inordinate amount of tries for a loose forward!
I thought Pro Legoate had a tough time on the night.
He looked ill at ease and flustered and most of the calls appeared to go the way of the home team.
The decision to card Derick Minnie with about 14 minutes to go was completely inaccurate as he complied totally with law.
Pro could not have seen the incident clearly and the net result was that the Golden Lions were reduced to 14 players for the remainder of the game, barring the last 2 minutes. I feel for Pro as he is one of the genuinely good guys on the circuit, but that effort simply is not enough at this level.
The Rugby Championship referee wrap up:
I have had a good look at the Referees in The Rugby Championship and think they will concede that there is much room for growth, even the best of them had an off day, so I will say the alarm bells are ringing, but not sure if anyone is listening… Yet!
My top 3 performances were :
- Nigel Owens – South Africa vs Australia at Newlands
- Jerome Garces – New Zealand vs South Africa in Wellington
- Craig Joubert – Argentina vs New Zealand in Buenos Aires
- I thought Gauzere (New Zealand vs Argentina), Clancy (Australia vs South Africa) and Owens (Argentina vs Australia) had off days.
Is it not time for a revamp of the system to help these moments where referees are not having good days at the office?
@ cane:
Well blow me:
And here I am thinking that it was the final arbiter, the English referee (not a TV Producer) that DECIDED ON AWARDING the penalty,
(& of course that it was a little Lambie, & not a TV Producer, that actually kicked the 55m pressure penalty to turn the referee’s sanction into consummated match winning points).
Sorry Cane, but the TV Production was NOT the causa causans of the Bok victory however much you obviously like to spin it that way.
88
Cane, have you forgotten to lose with grace, or are you just so unaccustomed to losing that you’ve never acquired that social skill?
@ BrumbiesBoy:
As I am BB.
I thought Wayne had a great game.
I have no problem with Barnsie.
@ BrumbiesBoy:
Oops, sorry, I meant to say Nigel Owen(s)
😳
@ Angostura:
I have never had “grace” Ango.
Never,
So, I take it you also have no problem with a non-neutral, TV Production Company, and 60,000 feral partisans commanding the outcome of a Rugby Test Match?
@ BrumbiesBoy:
Nigel would not have fallen for this crap.
Actually it is quite obvious that I’m the only person here who see’s this evil for what it is.
This precedent, if left unchecked, will soil the name Rugby and what it stands for.
But not one single person here even acknowledges that I have a point.
As I have said:
-The best Team won on the day.
-And yes, it was a penalty offence.
But life is not that simple.
Well…………………………..I suppose it is if you win.
But there are bigger issues here.
@ cane:
There are only two types of rugby fana
The decent and half decent ones 😥
And the looters 😉 e
The big screen displaying the hit on SB was the number on factor affecting the penalty call by Barnes and that will cost him dearly down the road
@ cane:
No different to what happened at Eden park last year.
34 @ cane:
But you ask a loaded question:
I deny the basis of your question. No TV Producer, & no partisan crowd commanded (sic) Saturday’s outcome. The outcome was determined by the sanction of the referee duly converted into points by the Iceman Lambie.
But what I would like to ask you is this:
Did you have no problem with coconut shy tackle which was the INITIATING CAUSE of the Bok victory/All Blacks loss? (Imo THAT deserved at least a yellow card).
@ Hondo:
You can’t even tell the difference between Dooley and Ackford so you can help yourself to a glass of shutthefuckup Hondkak my little special needs child.
😆
@ Hondo:
I don’t think so Hondo.
Once Sweet Jean de Villiers walked up to him (Barnsie) and pointed to the Big Screen………………………………Playing the incident over and over, and over in slow motion.
He could not have made any other decision.
Justice was done at Ellis Park, 2014
Justice was trampled at Eden Park, 2013
That’s the real difference:
And justice is no evil; it takes a warped value system to view justice as evil.
@ Angostura:
Mi can confirm that Caner is an entirely graceless mofo.
However he is the best of the kiwis.
Which is like saying that Charlie Manson is the best of the mass murderers.
@ Angostura:
Strange that the 3 Official (Neutral) Referee’s on the field of play didn’t seem to agree with your prognosis.
@ gunther:
Tis true.
I am totally without grace.
Amazingly.
@ Angostura:
Just wait for the howls of anguish when this little precedent bites you on the bum.
😉
@ gunther:
WTF have Dooley and Ackford got to do with SA cheating NZ out of a Test Match Victory.
Have you lost your marbles?
44 @ cane:
Well, the Referee awarded the penalty – and I saw you post earlier in this that the offence deserved a penalty
So that’s it then (apart from sour grapes) – justice done
Ciao
@ cane:
Hondo is a lobbotomised gibbon who knows nothing about rugby.
For fucksakes he barely knows the difference between petrol and ideal and that’s his job.
😆
@ Angostura:
😉
@ cane:
Justice was served.
It would have been unconscionable for your mob to have cheated us out of victory twice in two years.
😆
@ gunther:
It would appear Hondo has a far more balanced outlook than most of you fukkers.
46 @ cane:
One may retort to that nonsense with: “Just wait till the Bokke follow your example with a few coconut shy tackles of their own”, but it is kinda infantile …
88
Well, I guess, it is over to the Currie Cup – little point in crying over spilt milk
@ cane:
Goodnight gunna, Ango, Hondo, Go bokke and Bogleapers, and of course Macro.
And may god bless some of you.
@ Angostura:
exactly.
it is now written forever.
Bye cane
Remember to slip on your knickers next time 😀
Go well
@ cane:
Of course he does he has a chip on each shoulder.
However he lacks opposable thumbs.
😆
@ Angostura:
Hahahahahaha know you are sounding like a typical kiwi mother.
😆
Geez, the moment someone starts agreeing with Hondkak, they must take a long and hard look at themselves.
cane
this is a difficult scenario and I know its something that will be talked about for some time to come. so heres my take:
1. was the right decision made (was the penalty fair)? I believe so. as you’ve said the moment their arms were twisted to go upstairs, the penalty was definitely on because it was a definite foul.
2. was the means by which the decision were reached correct? yes and no!! yes, I believe that big brother is there and should be used to ensure that the results of test matches like these are a fair (or as fair as possible) reflection of what happened on the field of play. and a DEFINATE NO, the rules does not allow for unasked interference from big brother at the moment. hats off to the all black management for the way they handled this issue afterwards!!
3. has something like this happened in sport before? yes. zidane was sent from the field of play in his last world cup after an incident, missed by the officials, was played on the big screen. I cant see that its influenced soccer negatively in any way, but then im not a huge soccer follower
4. whats the way forward then? I believe that the white card system (something similar to cricket’s review system) should be implemented. captains from BOTH teams will then have the opportunity to review passages of play and will not be influenced by the sport networks, whether they’re playing home or away (will not be unduly influenced by decisions by the networks to display or not display stuff on the screen depending on where their allegiance lie as the players will definitely know when they’ve been fouled/ unfairly interfered with etc). I would make the review system for rugby a little bit different though and ONLY give EACH captain two chances to review, whether his review is successful or not. this prevent the game being held up because captains are reviewing every bloody thing!!
Users Online
Total 73 users including 0 member, 73 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,341,709 Page Impressions
_