Jonathan Kaplan

Jonathan Kaplan

This weekend saw the finale of The Rugby Championship and we saw two very contrasting games. The All Blacks won the trophy… again. Deservedly.

The Pumas won their first ever fixture in this tournament, a historical moment and one they will never forget… I certainly won’t, but the highlight had to be the bromance in the coaches box after the game where their Latin exuberance, warmth and hot blooded nature got the better of some of them… Put it this way, there was lots of lovin!!

Rate the Ref

The Springboks finally beat the All Blacks after coming quite close over the past couple of years.

From a parochial SA viewpoint it was a great win. Even, I suspect from a neutrals point of view, it was good to see a team challenge the best team, and beat them. There wasn’t much to choose between the teams, and the respect between the players and coaching staff is evident for all to see.

It is a beautiful thing of the sport of rugby union and one which we should cherish, as it doesn’t permeate through all sporting codes!

The Boks dominated the first half, the All Blacks the second. In the end, the game came down to a decision by the TV producer to highlight a misdemeanor by Liam Messam on Schalk Burger, which all the officials missed in real time. After finding the clip, and then replaying it over and over, eventually the Television Match Officials decided it was worthy of review, and correctly awarded a penalty to the Boks, which Pat Lambie (who has oodles of BMT) converted to win the game.

The TMO himself seemed a bit confused by referring to the fact that he thought perhaps arms were used in the tackle which was hardly the point. It was a swinging arm and a dangerous tackle.

If you are a Bok supporter, you will be saying we deserved it, and how many times it happened against us.

The protocol and process will mean nothing. But there is an important point to make here. I doubt (very much) whether that clip would have been brought up on the screen by producers in Australia or New Zealand and replayed over and over.

Is it right that someone outside of the domain of the match officials can affect the outcome of a major test match? And how neutral is he? In the end, it was his alertness that drew the attention of the crowd to the high tackle, they got into it, the officials then decided to take a look, and the resultant penalty determined the outcome.

I thought Wayne Barnes had a decent match. He walks a lot. He talks a lot.

And I wasn’t that impressed when he penalized Jan Serfontein for not rolling away when he could not (unplayable was the right call) or Jannie du Plessis for side entry on the All Black line when his action had no influence on the play at all (he attempted a clean and missed his target) or the resets of scrums when Franks’ feet are so far back on the touch, that he is almost certainly hanging over the cliff (not supporting his own body weight) and the last penalty… A brave call! BUT, he let the game flow with the right amount of empathy and game management. He was even handed in his approach.

He is a superior communicator. And he is smart!

He showed his experience in this toughest of environments when the reffing in this tournament has been quite ordinary, and deserves credit for that (and he was excellent at my braai on Tuesday with his singing of “Bye bye miss American pie”. So much for those people who regularly say the Northern referees are not up to it!

 

Argentina vs Australia:

Argentina beat Australia 21 – 17 after being down 0 – 14. They worked hard for this win, and worked hard for each other in the fixture. Their carry was excellent and they seemed to get rewards when they were in the Australian half.

Their tries were well constructed and I am really happy for them that they have finally won a game. Hopefully they will become even more competitive in the years to come and win an away game or two.

Australia will bemoan the fact that they let slip a biggish lead, but the real story will perhaps be the 3 Yellow Cards that the Wallabies received on match day.

Last week I was singing Nigel Owens’ praises after the match at Newlands. He has really shot to the fore after the 2011 Rugby World Cup in New Zealand but I thought he was poor on Saturday.

He was strangely hesitant in his decision making, once even asking the Assistant Referee whether there were hands in, after he penalized Australia and had pulled his Cards out already. He then put the cards back in his pocket. What was the point?

Not so lucky was the Australian No 9, Nick Phipps, who received a Yellow Card for a brilliant piece of play where he was the tackler and didn’t infringe at all.

What should have been a turnover to Australia, resulted in a Yellow Card which was a disaster for the Wallabies who then conceded a penalty and a try in his absence. Not great!! They would have been spitting mad as that decision had huge consequences for this test match.

Towards the end of the fixture, with the game still in the balance, the referee stopped the game when Hooper attempted a charge down, was airborne and in the process fell on top of Sanchez, the kicker.

He was also carded (incorrectly, as there was little he could do once he was airborne). Argentina converted the penalty and wound the clock down to record a historical moment for them and the tournament.

My opinion of Nigel hasn’t changed.

To say he was poor would be an understatement, but I know from personal experience that we all have these days (I had my fair share), and he will bounce back. I do feel for the Wallabies though and I thought they deserved better.

 

The Currie Cup:

On the Currie Cup front, the Blue Bulls dominated the Pumas in Nelspruit, where Peyps (Jaco Peyper) had an excellent game.

They are back in the mix! The Free State Cheetahs were very stiff against WP, who somehow managed to hack through a loose ball and fall on it.

To be honest, they shouldn’t have had a prayer at that stage of the game. Sarel Pretorius had a brain fart by taking a quick throw when his team were in the ascendency, instead of slowing everything down and winding the clock down.

That was far too adventurous for that stage of the game and perhaps ended up costing them the game. I still think he is a champion though!

Griquas predictably smashed the EP Kings 45-25, as I thought they might. Quite simply, they are tougher and want it more.

It was a happy and sad night for Jacques Botes, the most capped player in the history of the Currie Cup.

It was perhaps his last home game and he was given a rousing send-off by the crowd and by his fellow team mates. He is a model professional and a genuinely good guy.

He made a huge contribution to the game and earned his respect from teammates and opponents alike. He will be remembered as a workhorse who had an uncanny knack of appearing at the right place at the right time, scoring an inordinate amount of tries for a loose forward!

I thought Pro Legoate had a tough time on the night.

He looked ill at ease and flustered and most of the calls appeared to go the way of the home team.

The decision to card Derick Minnie with about 14 minutes to go was completely inaccurate as he complied totally with law.

Pro could not have seen the incident clearly and the net result was that the Golden Lions were reduced to 14 players for the remainder of the game, barring the last 2 minutes. I feel for Pro as he is one of the genuinely good guys on the circuit, but that effort simply is not enough at this level.

 

The Rugby Championship referee wrap up:

I have had a good look at the Referees in The Rugby Championship and think they will concede that there is much room for growth, even the best of them had an off day, so I will say the alarm bells are ringing, but not sure if anyone is listening… Yet!

My top 3 performances were :

  • Nigel Owens – South Africa vs Australia at Newlands
  • Jerome Garces – New Zealand vs South Africa in Wellington
  • Craig Joubert – Argentina vs New Zealand in Buenos Aires
  • I thought Gauzere (New Zealand vs Argentina), Clancy (Australia vs South Africa) and Owens (Argentina vs Australia) had off days.

Is it not time for a revamp of the system to help these moments where referees are not having good days at the office?

402 Responses to Jonathan Kaplan – Wrap up of the weekend

1 8 9 10 11 12 14
  • 271

    grootblousmile wrote:

    Jeeez, a looong discussion on something that a Kiwi Supporter (with a seriously soiled nappy) raised… in a fit of an embarrassing and shameful whinge….
    Stooping low now has a new meaning in the dictionary, I am sure!

    Inderdaar Distort

    That shit stirrer

  • 272

    270 @ Nama:
    You are grasping at straws here…

    Are you saying a ref has never reviewed something a Captain queried… surely you jest, it’s laughable!

    Why then, logically, does the Capatin have any rights to alert the ref, as has always been the case?

    The ref was alerted, whether it was from a querie of the Captain (as he has always had a right to do) or whether it was from a fellow match official, is immaterial.

    What remains standing is the foul play, which was rightly judged and found to be a penalty.

    The Referee CHOSE to review Jean’s request, it is his mandate to get a fair result… and correctly so, it turned out to be.

  • 273

    @ Nama:
    Holy crap your way off the reservation, did the All Blacks score a try?

    and YES if there is foul play a referee WILL review his decision, it has happened “umpteenth times all over the world”.

  • 274

    @ Nama:

    I’m pretty sure I just saw such an incident (revocation of an awarded try) recently, perhaps within the past 2 weeks.
    At present I only watch TRC & CC & must be in one of those competitions?

    Is there anybody else that can recall such an incident, & perhaps recall which match it was?

    OK, I’ll pop in later – gotta hit the road, Jack …

  • 275

    @ grootblousmile:

    Sorry I agree I was talking about Ashley pomping a cadaver.

  • 276

    275 @ gunther:
    Bwahahaha

    Necrophilia (also called thanatophilia or necrolagnia) is a seeeeeriaaaas abberation and not kindly looked upon by the Law….

    Delighted

  • 277

    250, 258, 275 @ gunther:
    Gosh that made me laugh when i read it now hahaha

  • 278

    @ Angostura:
    Whoooosshhhhhhhhh…

    @ grootblousmile:
    “Are you saying a ref has never reviewed something a Captain queried… surely you jest, it’s laughable!”

    Read again what I said. Can you give me an example of where a ref changed his decision of awarding a try after the captain complained to him about something that he saw on the big screen?

    @ MacroBlouBul:
    It is an example of the direction into which things can develop dumdum.

  • 279

    You get the sense here that some “supporters” are embarrassed by this win.

    Why do you think that is?

  • 280

    @ Angostura:
    Cancellation of a try is not what it is about. I’ve seen it happen before as well.

    Cancellation of a try after the captain sees something dodgy in the lead up on the big screen and then alert the ref about it. That’s what I’m talking about.

  • 281

    279 @ gunther:
    It’s about glasses… half full or half empty….

  • 282

    @ Nama:
    Dumdum, lol your argument makes no sense, you are opposed to a referee making the right decisions?

    Waaaaaaaaaaaaay in the opposite direction of our goal for a free and fair sport, called by a competent referee on the field of play.

  • 283

    Nama wrote:

    @ Angostura:
    Cancellation of a try is not what it is about. I’ve seen it happen before as well.
    Cancellation of a try after the captain sees something dodgy in the lead up on the big screen and then alert the ref about it. That’s what I’m talking about.

    Well done, the key word there is dodgy.

    Don’t play dodgy rugby.

  • 284

    @ grootblousmile:

    I think the problem ashley has is that they are so unresponsive.

    Maybe if they knew they were on the big screen they’d put a bit more effort into it?

  • 285

    @ gunther:
    gunther wrote:

    You get the sense here that some “supporters” are embarrassed by this win.
    Why do you think that is?

    Pollard was good this weekend hey? Wink

  • 286

    @ gunther:
    But why do you want people to guess? You know the answer, don’t you?

    Just give it to them. 😉

  • 287

    284 @ gunther:
    Flok… solank mens net nie ‘n dooie spyker tot die dooie se voete vuisies maak van lekkerkry nie….

    Bwahahaha

    You are one funny dude, Herr Gunther!

    I’ll drink one on you tonight, for brightening up my day!

  • 288

    @ MacroBlouBul:

    Hoagie wasn’t bad either.

    And Serfontein.

    So much of entitlement.

    😆

  • 289

    Jinne, have you guys seen that we have 2 new SuperBru pools?

    OK, OK, do not all jump AT ONCE!

    Fokkie Toggie!

  • 290

    @ gunther:
    ha, good reviews for that old man Vic as well 😈

  • 291

    @ MacroBlouBul:
    “…called by a competent referee on the field of play.”

    Wonder for how long he’ll be viewed as “competent”. Until he makes a mistake against us? Pondering

  • 292

    You SAFFA’s are a funny bunch, you’ve just beaten one of the best sides in the entire history of the game and you’re still bickering, god help us if you actually ever win any silverware 😀 😀

  • 293

    @ Nama:
    Sure, until he makes a WRONG match influencing error for any team he would to walk the plank.

    But walking the plank for doing the right thing? I mean come on.

  • 294

    @ NZINCHINA:
    haha my mood won’t be spoilt, I AM happy we won 😀

  • 295

    @ MacroBlouBul:
    Yes, Pollard was good. In fact, I’ll say he was very good.

    His report card this year reads:
    vs Arg (h)…poor
    vs Arg (a)… poor
    vs AB (a)… good
    vs Aus (h)…poor
    vs AB ()…very good

    Now he needs to become consistently good.

  • 296

    Serfontein on the other hand…

    Missed his tackle on Conrad Smith that led to a try Other missed tackles as well. He is still not a 13 despite the odd break/half break by him.

  • 297

    @ MacroBlouBul:

    Sure how could you not be, i’m actually quite surprised at the reaction back home when we normally lose it’s the end of the world stuff, this time there was hardly any of that just reflection on what a great team it is and a loss at some stage was enevitable.

  • 298

    @ Nama:
    295 OH DEAR Bring back Hansie.- ____Brewis that is

  • 299

    @ Nama:

    He was, it cost us the game his try before half time. They stood off him and gave him way too much space when they should have been closing him down.

  • 300

    @ ryecatcher:

    Congratulations on your victory Rye, pretty sweet one at Ellis for your boys.

1 8 9 10 11 12 14

Users Online

Total 136 users including 0 member, 136 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm