KwaZulu-Natal rivals Glenwood and Hilton College will no longer meet on the rugby field.
According to saschoolsports.co.za, this follows the one-sided nature of the matches between the schools this season. Glenwood’s 1st XV won 67-7, their U16s 52-0, U15s 52-0 and U14s 61-3.
“After careful consideration [we have] decided to discontinue all rugby fixtures against Glenwood High School for the foreseeable future,” said Hilton headmaster Peter Ducasse in a statement.
saschoolsports.co.za
‘The simple reason for this decision is that Glenwood’s fairly recent strategy has, in our firm opinion, now moved them into a different league. Apart from the increased risk of injury, which is associated with such mismatches, we see no educational value [for any of the players] in playing matches where the contest is decidedly one-sided.”
“I have spoken openly to the headmaster of Glenwood about this and have made it clear that these are the only reasons for our decision. There is no animosity between our two schools. Hilton College would welcome, should Glenwood so choose, continuing to play fixtures against them in other sports.”
The traditional rivalry between Glenwood and Hilton College on the rugby field is all but over and it may well stay that way for many seasons to come. We spoke exclusively to the Head Master of Glenwood, Mr. Trevor Kershaw to get his take on the situation.
Firstly let’s recap on what Hilton College said are the reasons for discontinuing rugby ties with Glenwood.
They mentioned that Glenwood has:
“moved into a different league” with a strategy that has made matches between the two schools “mismatches.”
Hilton College further said that as the matches have become “decidedly one-sided” there is now an “increased risk of injury” which has resulted in “no educational value (for any players).”
Those are some pretty interesting claims but ones that to a certain extent can be supported by the results of the 2014 fixtures between the two schools. Take a look at what transpired this season on the rugby field:
It is clear that Hilton College were on the receiving end of some pretty big defeats (although their 5th and 6th team had good wins). The question is; should these types of results lead a school to pull out of facing Glenwood in the future?
What would the famous players from Hilton like Springbok Captain’s Bob Skinstad and Gary Teichmann think? Can players from Hilton still be considered for Craven, Academy or Grant Khomo Weeks if they do not play one of the strongest teams in the province?
We asked the Headmaster of Glenwood, Mr Trevor Kershaw for his reaction to the situation. After considering the future without a Hilton College match on the fixture list, Kershaw admitted that he was, “very disappointed but we respect their decision and we understand their reasoning on the matter.”
What about the claim from Hilton that Glenwood’s strategy has moved them into a different category and that this has increased the risk of injury?
Trevor Kershaw did not agree that Glenwood had a different strategy that increased the injury risk saying, “no, I doubt it and this is difficult to quantify.
I cannot comment for Hilton [but] for Glenwood, we are trying hard to compete at a National level and ensure that we feed good players into the KZN Teams in all fields of endeavour. That is our strategy.”
Perhaps that statement is closer to what we are really discussing here. Glenwood do have a strategy, their modus operandi is to compete not just on a provincial level, but on a higher plane, on a National level. With the objective of providing quality players to the KwaZulu-Natal teams.
Could it be that Hilton College believe that a school that has that strategy or objective has now moved, as they said, “into another category?”
And if this is the case should a finger be pointed at Glenwood for embarking on this policy that will ultimately improve the sport in the country? Alternatively should a school like Glenwood be a feeder to the provincial structures?
It is clear that nobody wants to see too traditional rivals go their separate ways but one is forced to wonder if a Hilton vs Glenwood rugby match will ever be played again as there is little likelihood of Glenwood changing their strategy just to accommodate another school who doesn’t share their vision.
It does also beg the question, that if other schools also start beating Hilton in 2015 as dominantly, would they be forced to also withdraw from future fixtures, leaving one of South Africa’s most famous schools with even fewer opportunities to showcase their tradition?
Trevor Kershaw however was quietly optimistic when he considered the future of the two schools saying that, “the sooner we can play again, the better for KZN rugby.”
Any ex or current Hilton or Glenwood boys on here?
Your thoughts?
@ nortierd:
Yes, should be interesting to hear our Sharks bloggers on this extraordinary decision by Hilton.
It is a bit like Paarl Gym deciding not to compete against Boys High anymore…
@ Pietman:
I’m sure they have their reasons, but I can’t help thinking a team must aspire to do better?
I remember Waterkloof beating Garsfontein by more than 100 points when my daughter was in Grade 8, when she left after matriek, Garsies had turned it around and actually beat Waterkloof, and all within 5 years.
hilton is just a school for 400 or so very very rich boys.
theyv would never lower standards to include Rugby boys with potential like other schools
MacroBok wrote:
So rich boys can’t play, is that what you are saying?
Klink eerder na slagatgeit vir my!
@ Pietman:
I don’t they have a lot of numbers. .. probably barely makes fiul teams.
A (tail between the legs) cop out:
Imagine if, for instance, Brazil refused to in future play against Germany subsequent the Germans beating them 7-1 in WC2014! Unthinkable … contrary to the character building spirit of sport.
Eish!
Quite a few schools are considering their options.
Unfortunately Glenwood have taken the view that they will do anything to become a force in rugby at national level. This includes bringing in boys from other schools/provinces to build up a potent first team.
This is not the same as Grey College who attract good players through their reputation as a top rugby school.
@ Charo:
That’s what Garsfontein had to do.
They brought in some “Capies” and it worked.
Those kids played well, and some of them now have contracts from the Sharks, Lions and Pumas.
Ironically, not at the Bulls and the WP where they came from 😀
Users Online
Total 110 users including 0 member, 110 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,327,602 Page Impressions
_