The Springbok team to face Scotland in Port Elizabeth will be markedly different from the one that edged Wales in Nelspruit, by necessity rather than design.
With seven European-based players unavailable for selection and at least another two starters ruled through injury Heyneke Meyer’s hand will be forced when he names his team to face an under-strength Scotland.
However, the idea that Meyer should completely overhaul the team and give promising youngsters a shot because the match falls outside the June Test window and Scotland will not have their best team on the park is a little bit misguided.
rugby365
First of all anyone who has paid remote attention to Meyer’s selection policy will know that he does not believe that Test rugby is the place for experimentation or giving players chances. The relative strength of the Scottish team is not particularly relevant here as it remains a Test match and the Boks’ last match together ahead of the Rugby Championship.
The best chance new players have to shine is within a settled environment where they are surrounded by experience. The third British and Irish Lions Test in 2009 provides a good example of how badly things can go if continuity is tampered with too much and Meyer will certainly not be willing to surrender any momentum as he prepares for the challenge that New Zealand, Australia and Argentina will pose in August.
Yes there will be major changes to the team this week, but it would be very surprising if there were more than is absolutely necessary given the players available.
There will have to be two changes to the tight five with Tendai Mtawarira and Flip van der Merwe sidelined through injury, whilst in the loose trio there are doubts over the fitness of Willem Alberts and Francois Louw will be back with Bath.
Gurthro Steenkamp was Mtawarira’s back-up on Saturday but he will be back with Toulouse which means that either Coenie Oosthuizen or Trevor Nyakane could be given a shot at loosehead prop. The opening at lock could well see Lodewyk de Jager get his first Test start alongside Victor Matfield who is now the most experienced Bok ever after surpassing John Smit last week.
If Alberts is not fit then it could open the door for Teboho Mohoje to make his debut, although he is more likely to start on the bench with Schalk Burger perhaps given the No.7 jersey he last wore at the 2011 World Cup. The absence of Louw means that Sharks flank Marcell Coetzee should get a crack at openside flank after spending the last two years watching Louw from the sidelines.
In the backline the biggest question mark revolves around flyhalf and whether Meyer will throw IRB World Junior Player of the year Handre Pollard in the deep end with Morne Steyn back in Paris. Johan Goosen and Marnitz Boshoff are expected to be fit again, so it seems more likely that Pollard would join the fray in the second half if he indeed does get his chance.
Those wanting to see some different options in Springbok colours this weekend will certainly get their wish, but those expecting a completely new side are likely to be left a little disappointed when the team is announced on Wednesday
29 @ Pietman:
Attie Bekker is Handriekie se een “Vennoot” en deel van die toekomstige uitbreiding van die “Talk Empire”.
Julle sal vandag later begin sekere dinge sien gebeur op Rugby-Talk… hou dop!
@ Pietman:
12
The ONLY point is the bold statement the thread made, read it again below:
“First of all anyone who has paid remote attention to Meyer’s selection policy will know that he does not believe that Test rugby is the place for experimentation or giving players chances.”
While HM posts a 0:4 Vs the ABs, PdV was already a 4:2 after 2 years of his tenure 🙂
And it does make a hell of a difference
@ MacroBok:
13
And that’s must be the ‘Party Line’ I guess?
grootblousmile wrote:
You want stats
Playing VS SH teams
P13 Win 7 Lost 5 drew 1 Winning percentage 53.8%
Tier 1
Played 13 W 7 L 5 Drew 1
The only thing different to previous coaches is that what ever Heynecke does, this site says thank you your highness.
And no i think PdeV had his chance, i dont want him back. The fact is everyone said he Peter, used Jakes men , well well so does HM, he uses them too, even though some of them was called back from pension.
Read what i say, i dont mind Victor to play again, he played himself into the team, it is just one of the many JW recruits that he is ploughing with. Well that was said about Peter , why not say it to HM.
I can waste my time here to bring in comparisons. The fact is This site is the only Rugby site blindly following everything HM does.
There is nothing that i want to change but HM is just another coach, he does not deserve any special treatment yet. If he loses 1 test against each of NZ and Australia his percentage i mentioned at the beginning will not improve.
Peter after his 3rd winter tours and at the same stage as HM now
Won against 1 tier teams 61.1% of his games, note the British Lions was also played
P 18, W 11, L 7
JW was 47%
P 15, W 7, L 7, D 1
Users Online
Total 199 users including 0 member, 199 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm