India and South Africa battled each other in the World T20 Cricket competition 2nd semi-final at Shere Bangla National Stadium, Mirpur on Friday 4 April 2014.
The 1st semi-final took place on Thursday 3 5 April 2014 between Sri Lanka and West Indies, with Sri Lanka winning and advancing to the final.
The match started at 15:00 SA Time.
South Africa won the Toss and chose to bat first.
The score cards were updated at regular intervals here on Rugby-Talk.
India win with 5 balls spare, and win by 6 wickets.
South Africa: 172 / 4 (20 Overs)
India: 176 / 4 (19.1 Overs)
India won by 6 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
| South Africa innings (20 overs maximum) | R | M | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Q de Kock† | c †Dhoni b Kumar | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 150.00 |
|
HM Amla | b Ashwin | 22 | 24 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 137.50 |
|
F du Plessis* | b Ashwin | 58 | 53 | 41 | 5 | 2 | 141.46 |
| JP Duminy | not out | 45 | 56 | 40 | 1 | 3 | 112.50 | |
|
AB de Villiers | c RG Sharma b Ashwin | 10 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 125.00 |
| DA Miller | not out | 23 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 191.66 | |
| Extras | (b 1, lb 3, w 3, nb 1) | 8 | ||||||
| Total | (4 wickets; 20 overs) | 172 | (8.60 runs per over) | |||||
Did not bat JA Morkel, DW Steyn, BE Hendricks, Imran Tahir, WD Parnell
Fall of wickets 1-9 (de Kock, 0.4 ov), 2-44 (Amla, 5.1 ov), 3-115 (du Plessis, 13.5 ov), 4-129 (de Villiers, 15.3 ov)
| Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B Kumar | 4 | 0 | 33 | 1 | 8.25 | (1w) |
| MM Sharma | 3 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 11.33 | ||
|
R Ashwin | 4 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 5.50 | (1w) |
| RA Jadeja | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 4.00 | ||
| SK Raina | 4 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 8.75 | (1w) | |
| A Mishra | 3 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 12.00 | (1nb) |
| India innings (target: 173 runs from 20 overs) | R | B | 4s | 6s | SR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RG Sharma | c du Plessis b Hendricks | 24 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 184.61 |
|
AM Rahane | c de Villiers b Parnell | 32 | 30 | 2 | 1 | 106.66 |
| V Kohli | not out | 72 | 44 | 5 | 2 | 163.63 | |
|
Yuvraj Singh | c de Villiers b Imran Tahir | 18 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 105.88 |
|
SK Raina | c du Plessis b Hendricks | 21 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 210.00 |
| MS Dhoni*† | not out | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Extras | (w 9) | 9 | |||||
| Total | (4 wickets; 19.1 overs) | 176 | (9.18 runs per over) | ||||
Did not batR Ashwin, RA Jadeja, A Mishra, B Kumar, MM Sharma
Fall of wickets 1-39 (RG Sharma, 3.5 ov), 2-77 (Rahane, 9.3 ov), 3-133 (Yuvraj Singh, 15.6 ov), 4-167 (Raina, 18.3 ov)
| Bowling | O | M | R | W | Econ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP Duminy | 3 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 9.66 | (1w) | |
| JA Morkel | 2 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 8.50 | ||
| DW Steyn | 3.1 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 11.36 | (2w) | |
|
BE Hendricks | 4 | 0 | 31 | 2 | 7.75 | (3w) |
|
WD Parnell | 3 | 0 | 33 | 1 | 11.00 | (2w) |
|
Imran Tahir | 4 | 0 | 30 | 1 | 7.50 | (1w) |
Match details
Series – India advanced
TV umpire – BNJ Oxenford (Australia)
Match referee – RS Madugalle (Sri Lanka)
Reserve umpire – RA Kettleborough (England)
Match Notes
- Powerplay: Overs 0.1 – 6.0 (Mandatory – 44 runs, 2 wickets)
- South Africa: 50 runs in 7.2 overs (44 balls), Extras 5
- 3rd Wicket: 50 runs in 43 balls (F du Plessis 37, JP Duminy 10, Ex 3)
- F du Plessis: 50 off 36 balls (5 x 4, 1 x 6)
- South Africa: 100 runs in 12.3 overs (76 balls), Extras 7
- South Africa: 150 runs in 18.3 overs (112 balls), Extras 8
- Innings Break: South Africa – 172/4 in 20.0 overs (JP Duminy 45, DA Miller 23)
- Powerplay: Overs 0.1 – 6.0 (Mandatory – 56 runs, 1 wicket)
- India: 50 runs in 4.6 overs (30 balls), Extras 4
- India: 100 runs in 12.3 overs (75 balls), Extras 7
- V Kohli: 50 off 35 balls (1 x 4, 2 x 6)
- 3rd Wicket: 50 runs in 37 balls (V Kohli 36, Yuvraj Singh 18, Ex 1)
- India: 150 runs in 16.5 overs (101 balls), Extras 8
Ben wrote:
Die boulers was die hele toernooi deur swak.
Net elke wedstryd het een ons gat gered op n spesifieke tyd, die res was onder standaard, so vandag is nie n verassing nie.
@Gummi
I’m positive that we can pull back some wins over the next few rounds.
It won’t be enough to make the top 6, but then, it’s not like we thought we are top material.
We should finish up mid table at least, and for that to happen, we need about 6 wins from the last 10 odd games, very doable with the derbies and home games
@ nortierd:
It is the year of the Shark… well who knows…
I’m really outta here now…
Cheers guys…
Gumboots wrote:
Yep, they will be in the final, we won’t make the top 6, but we also shouldn’t end bottom of the log
fark me kohli was brilliant thuroughly deserved this! Indias running between the wicket s was brilliant!
Missed the second half, well done India, and well done Kohli – Brilliant. India’s game that.
As I listened to the commentary in the car, I got more and more frustrated. Our bowling is still lacking in both departments, and as good as Parnell can be, and has the potential to be, he does seem to get a little flustered, and we effectively lost the match in the over that he conceded 17 runs. He has done well over the last couple of years to control his aggressive frustration, but still needs to do more before he can come into serious contention. But I don’t blame him, whoever bowled that over was going to be carted, and it was unlucky it was him.
For me the frustration came in the field placement. That was a defensive pattern that would have put the Stormers and AC to shame! It was obviously a well worked out tactic to starve the Indians of boundaries, but not once did the Proteas put any pressure onto the batsmen. Not even when Yuvraj came in did they bring in anyone to stop the singles. And my frustration comes in the fact that Faf had obviously been told to play that tactic (he is normally a much more aggressive player), and not to veer from the plan under any circumstances. Was this a Domingo plan? If so it wasn’t that well thought out. No plan ‘B’ and no flexibility.
We effectively gave them 120 runs in singles today, Kohli and his entourage just had to get the odd 4 and 6 to make up the rest of the score, and no bowlers are going to be able to bowl 120 balls in the right spot to stop the odd boundary.
No, that match was far too easy for the Indians. There was never any pressure placed on them after SA posted a very good 172.
I think the Indians would still have won – and deservedly so, they are the best at T20 atm – but I blame the captain and management for handing it to them on a plate.
There are some good players in our team, and with another world class bowler and a better all-rounder (Albie is never going to cut it) and a more solid opening partnership, we will become a formidable T20 side.
RSA would do well in any cricket tournament if you dont put these two words to its name “World Cup”.
They just wilt at the thought.
Users Online
Total 118 users including 0 member, 118 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,785,093 Page Impressions
_