A Special General Council Meeting to discuss the restructuring of the Currie Cup has been postponed, the SA Rugby Union (SARU) said in a statement on Tuesday.
The meeting, scheduled to be held in Cape Town on Friday, has been moved to 13 February.
Sport24
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss, for the third time, a proposal to expand the premier domestic rugby competition from six to eight teams in 2014.
“However, soundings taken by the Executive Council (Exco) in advance of the meeting clearly indicated that the latest proposal was unlikely to reach the required two-thirds majority,” SARU said.
“In those circumstances, the Games and Policies Committee has been asked to reconsider the proposal for re-submission to the council next month.”
In the current format, the team which finishes bottom of the log plays a promotion/relegation playoff against the top finisher in the first division.
Last season, the Pumas gained promotion at the expense of the Griquas who were relegated to the first division.
The restructuring would allow Griquas to remain in the premier division, while the Eastern Province Southern Kings, who finished second in the first division, would also find themselves in top-flight rugby in the 2014 season.
SARU president Oregan Hoskins said it was not merely a matter of agreeing to expansion, but that differences between the provinces on other matters needed to be resolved.
“There are local dynamics. We know in the Eastern Cape there is a huge challenge between the partners Eastern Province, Border and the South-Western Districts,” Hoskins said when the proposal was mooted last year.
“They are at massive loggerheads and it is a challenge for us and we are working with them to work through their differences to see if they can’t find common ground.”
The way the finances were distributed among the 14 unions also posed a challenge, he said.
“There is a huge issue in our rugby about how the cake should be divided.
“The small unions have over the last few years received a massive exponential increase in terms of grants from the mother body.
“My worry is the bigger unions who have to contract the Springbok players and we’ve seen the exodus of players.
“If we don’t get it right in how we divide the cake, we are going to be in trouble going forward.”
Jeez, what a bunch of spineless, gutless plonkers at SARU and on the Presidents Council of SA Rugby!!
Can’t or won’t make a decision!
@ grootblousmile:
Some of us expect no less!
“If we don’t get it right in how we divide the cake, we are going to be in trouble going forward.”
I’m sure that SARU’s erstwhile CEO has more than enough experience in doctoring the financial statements to ensure that every Union thinks that they are getting a fair share of the pie, while at the same time making sure that there is enough left in the “correct” pot to allow him a nice bonus, decent (CPI + 15%) salary increase and enough 1st class plane tickets and 5 star accomodation in Europe at least 5 times a year.
IOW make a decsion for the good of Rugby SARU, get rid of the shytsters and put the damned money where it’s neede to develop the game.
Useless prats!
Users Online
Total 122 users including 0 member, 122 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm