There are no current moves afoot to establish a global calendar for the Rugby Union season, a senior IRB official said, amid complaints that it is too long.
Brett Gosper, the IRB’s Chief Executive Officer, said it was a matter of complex negotiation for which no one currently had the “heart”.
AFP
Many players such as All Blacks great Dan Carter have backed calls to overhaul global rugby’s playing calendar, saying the off-season is too short under the existing schedule and risks player burnout.
Carter says that a combination of international duties and the Super 15 season meant he had missed pre-season training every year for a decade.
The playmaker argued the Southern Hemisphere’s eight week off-season in December-January should be doubled to 16 weeks, allowing players to properly recuperate from the physical demands of a high-impact sport.
His concerns have been echoed by All Blacks coach Steve Hansen and New Zealand Rugby Players Association chief Rob Nichol, with Hansen blaming the demanding season for the departure of a number of All Backs to Japan.
However, all previous attempts by the IRB to improve coordination of the global calendar have failed due to the demands of various interests in the game.
Traditionalists do not want showpiece events such as the Six Nations moved, Europe’s powerful clubs oppose further disruption of their season, while the Southern and Northern Hemispheres each want Test windows tailored to their needs.
Gosper, talking to AFP ahead of the June 28 to 30 IRB Rugby World Cup Sevens in Moscow, was phlegmatic in his response.
“Before I arrived there were lots of working parties that met to try to reconcile a global calendar,” the Australian said.
“It just didn’t work, they could not get an agreement from all parties on what was possible in terms of the global calendar.
“I don’t say that’s not a bad objective now and we should be still working towards one. But certainly there doesn’t seem to be a lot of heart for people to get into a room and talk about that.”
But Gosper said talks could one day resume should there be interest.
“At some point, that subject will come back and we will attempt to try again if we get a sense that some of the parties are willing to,” he told AFP.
“It’s a negotiation and it’s a very complex one, a very crowded calendar with a lot of disparate interests around the world, it’s not an easy task.”
Gosper, who spent the bulk of his playing career with the Paris-based Racing club, was also reticent to comment on the movement of players overseas, saying it was a personally-driven choice that home unions had to face up to.
“These players obviously must have the freedom of choice to ply their trade wherever they see fit,” he said.
“They have the interest of their families and earnings at heart. They have to trade off: to reconcile their desire to play for their country with earning the living they want to earn.
“It’s up to the unions themselves to provide a stronger, compelling argument that they should remain within the fold of their national team as best as they can.
“It’s very attractive to play in France, with the money being offered and given the atmosphere of the stadiums. It’s a great attraction for players.”
They are like SARU, no vision whatsoever… none!
agreed
SANZAR should break away from the IRB. They don’t care about the rugby in the southern hemisphere. Rugby in the south will die a slow death if they don’t.
SANZAR can then introduce smaller competitions, maybe some proper tours. Try to pull in more countries. If the money is right, other countries will follow. I will certainly pay good money to see old school tours, where you get a midweek game like the Bulls against all blacks, etc. I don’t really care about the world cup. It’s over rated.
Something must be done to save our rugby and I can only see thing happening by giving those old IRB farts the finger.
And the poor players, their biggest asset after the viewing and paying public, will continue to be exploited and played into the ground.
There is another crowd that feels SA should break away form SANZAR and form a partnership with the European nations for different but also valid reasons
Some of us care a hell of a lot about the Word Cup, myself included, and feel the Currie Cup is over rated
@ Gena_ZA:
So, SARU must determine what solution will keep the younger players in South Africa? a Rebel break away competition or joining a European competition?
I’m getting bored with the current competitions. Super 15 is to long and I already lost interest. This 4 nations competition didn’t really do it for me either. The rugby championship is same old, same old.
IMO the players want something new as well. It’s not all about the money. Players want to experience different cultures, different challenges. They need something new.
@ Gena_ZA:
Currie Cup for me is the life blood of SA Rugby. It is still our premier domestic competition. While we may not have the top international players for a huge chunk of the competition, it is valuable for younger players coming through, and for top players returning from injury. It is also a good platform for Super Rugby franchises to blood new blood for the next SR competition.
I don’t argue the value of the CC, not the tradition. But for said reasons is is also becoming a bit deflated
Bottom line is my opinion – there is too much rugby
Like him or hate him – go read Mark Keohane’s piece in the business times about facing the AB’s only every 3 years
I think most of us will agree with his sentiments
Users Online
Total 130 users including 0 member, 130 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,331,322 Page Impressions
_