This is a briefing document on South African participation in the 2013 Vodacom Super Rugby competition.

Decision-making authority

• The identity of the South African teams participating in the Vodacom Super Rugby competition is governed by the constitution of the South African Rugby Union (SARU).
• Clause 9.2.5 specifies that the General Meeting is responsible for the “approval of the format, structure and composition of SARU’s Major Competition, currently known as the Absa Currie Cup or its successor, as well as determining the SA teams to participate in Super Rugby competitions.”
• The voting membership of the General Meeting is made up of two representatives of the 14 provinces – each of whom has one vote (28) – and the chairman of the meeting (who is the President of the South African Rugby Union or his deputy) making a total of 29 votes.
• A simple majority is required to pass motions in relation to this clause.
• The next scheduled General Meeting of SARU is Friday, July 13 in Cape Town.

Events in 2012

January 27: A Special General Meeting was held to consider Vodacom Super Rugby participation (among other things).
• The SARU Executive Council (Exco) proposed that the top four teams in the South African conference at the end of the 2012 competition join the Southern Kings as the South African representatives in the 2013 competition.
• It was also proposed that the last-placed team in the South African Conference would play a promotion/relegation match against the non-Super Rugby franchise at the conclusion of the 2013 and 2014 competitions.
• The meeting reaffirmed the Kings’ participation in the 2013 tournament.
• The franchises requested that a decision on the mechanism of qualification was postponed to allow them time to make alternative proposals.
• The General Meeting accepted the request. Jurie Roux, SARU CEO, asked for it to be recorded that the delay in a decision was at the franchises’ request, therefore precluding them from criticism of delays in any decisions.

February 23: Franchise representatives and members of the Exco met for a second time to discuss the way forward.
• It was decided that franchises representatives would accompany SARU’s SANZAR delegates (Roux and deputy president Mark Alexander) to meet SANZAR partners with proposals to encompass the inclusion of a sixth South African franchise. The group was scheduled to depart on March 17.

March 14: A final preparation meeting was held between franchise representatives and SARU’s SANZAR delegates.
• The meeting requested SARU to write to Australia and New Zealand requesting a postponement in the visit in order to prepare additional expansion options.
• No date has been rescheduled.

SARU Comment

“Rugby has been consistently united in supporting the Kings’ place in Vodacom Super Rugby in 2013,” said Jurie Roux, SARU CEO. “Our focus has been on finding a rugby answer to the questions that flow from that that’s fair, transparent in its mechanism and will strengthen South African rugby in the long run. Those discussions continue.

“Until a final decision is reached, the franchises and the SARU presidency are agreed that it would be unhelpful to the competing teams to publicly debate the pros and cons of different scenarios. When a decision is announced we will be able to report back to rugby supporters in full.”

Next Steps

May 17: Franchise representatives and members of Exco will meet in Johannesburg for further discussions. Media should note that this is not a decision-making body and can only make recommendations to the Exco.

May 24: Next scheduled meeting of the SARU Exco.

July 13: Next scheduled meeting of the SARU General Council.

5 Responses to Vodacom Super Rugby Participation in 2013: From SARU

  • 1

    Not included in this briefing document is the very significant letter from South African Rugby’s 5 Super Rugby franchises:

    The recent letter sent by the five current franchises to Saru in which they made their views on the Kings’ entry in 2013 very clear:
    ‘It should NOT be at the expense of one of the current franchises’.

    The letter had certain very clear conditions:

    “That none of the existing franchises shall be prejudiced by such inclusion [of the Kings] in any way whatsoever;

    That none of the existing franchises shall be eliminated from the tournament in 2013 or at any stage thereafter as a result of the inclusion of the Kings.”

    And that my dear friends is it.

    Nite-Nite.

  • 2

    This Kings inclusion reeks of POLITICS.

  • 3

    when RSA brings in the relegation/promotion system players will include no Super rugby get out clauses in their contracts. you will see the same players being recycled between the franchises.

  • 4

    Maybe it is time for SARU and South African rugby to leave SANZAR. The Aussies are only in it for their own gain. We can always talk to ERC (European Rugby Committee) regarding joining the Heineken CUp, Amlin CHallenge and 6 Nations after teh SANZAR deals expire at the end of 2015 as it stands. Screw Murdoch and his billions. Europe has more.

  • 5

    4 @ djvanman:
    Not so easy joining any Northern Hemisphere competition.

    Until there is ONE GLOBAL SEASON, this will not happen.

    Simply too many obstacles

Users Online

Total 111 users including 0 member, 111 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm