Statistics are like a lamppost to a drunk man. It does not serve to illuminate but rather, to keep him upright.
A very apt description when it comes to statistics, specifically where it is used to motivate the inclusion and exclusion of certain players.
I had to learn the hard way that statistics, although extremely useful, can sometimes be very damaging. Especially in a dynamic medium such as rugby where success is dependent on more things than just raw mathematical or scientific data. Most telling, statistics only become useful, or useless, depending on the interpretation of data and how that is done.
In my days of doing analysis in sport I got very frustrated by certain coaches insistence on the continued selection of certain players when my analytical data suggested they were not where they should be from a performance point of view considering widely accepted bench marks. That was until I ventured into coaching myself.
I learned as the saying above goes, that statistics merely support views in rugby, it does not illuminate or give certain clarity on events or players.
Practically I am also reminded of this whenever I see a Baa-baa team, or World XV team assembled. Statistically you can pick the best individual players in the world in certain positions, but that is no guarantee they will gel as a team, in fact, they seldom do.
The recent End of Year Tour was supposed to answer the question of leadership within the Springbok team, in the absence of regular captain John Smit who underwent surgery and rehab. His long serving deputy, Victor Matfield was charged with the honour to lead the Boks on tour and given the performances, the questions on whether there is life after John Smit from a captaincy or leadership role, remains largely unanswered.
The situation is even more complicated with the fact that Smit’s continued inclusion in the Bok team mostly based on his leadership ability, is keeping who many believe to be the best hooker in the world at the moment, Bismarck du Plessis, on the bench.
Many argue it is more of a sentimental issue than a logical one, and statistically they can prove this to you rather convincingly, but I am afraid it is not that simple.
I think Smit would be first to admit that 2010 was a forgettable year for him. From a form and conditioning perspective it was probably his worst year as a professional player.
But is one bad season enough to make what would arguably the most crucial decision for a Rugby World Cup in 2011?
If one bad season is all we consider, not many players will play more than 20 tests for South Africa, let alone 50 or 100.
It is a very fine line one walks when you pick teams based on form alone, especially at test level where form comes from different dynamics (lower levels of competition, different teams and different competitions).
The question we should ask, is whether a fit, conditioned John Smit would be a asset, or liability for the Springboks at World Cup 2011?
Following that, it would be up to the player to ensure he is (fit and conditioned), because I do not believe this should be a case of either or, for me it is a case of having the best captain, lock forward, and hooker in a match day 22, and I cannot see why this is impossible.
Morné Rysmier,
See you’re lurking around like a lost poep…. seems that the holidays are agreeing with you, or are maybe a bit quiet for your liking… hehehe
@ grootblousmile:
Way too quiet…
2@ Morné:
Is it not nice to be too quiet?
I’m freeging lazy as all hell, had a magnificent weekend (Friday and Saturday), with some blesbok hunting and horseriding and stuff…. now battling to get back into work mood.
@ grootblousmile:
I am in my 2nd week of holiday already, my first for 5 years and I am bored as shit!!!
4@ Morné:
Goeie flok, wens ek kon nou al breuk vir vakansie, hou eers op werk Donderdagmiddag laat… dan in Januarie is ek terug in die werk vir so 3 dae voor ons op 6 Januarie op ‘n lekker lang vakansietoer gaan tot 23 Januarie.
I’m prepared to put a case of beer on John Smit starting.
Statistically speaking our 6th batsmen down played up to sh!t….despite us winning…..because they didnt play.
One of the reasons I wont relegate Habana to the dustbin, with a proper centre pairing in place and regular ball going to the wing we will thin out the opposing defences and you wont have 3 guys on Habana every time.
Bissie will come on 2nd half and play the easier games in the world cup….Super 15 it is the perfect opportunity to give both guys enough rugby, but not too much.
Interesting article Morne. But I have to say John Smit’s captaincy is more of a legend than anything else. You can make many valid arguments against John Smit’s captaincy. How many times did the Sharks choke with him as captain?
You choose your team on rugby playing ability, and how John Smit ever made a Springbok team with quality hookers like Bismarck du Plessis, Gary Botha, etc. should be questioned. If you’re not the best in your position the honorable thing and what any great leader would do is step down. John Smit played the “I will do anything for the team” card and played tighthead prop last season, which was a failure and it was obvious there were better tightheads than him, the smart thing would’ve been to step down. The Springboks will lose nothing from John Smit’s departure.
In reality a country whose rugby is healthy, would rarely have players playing 100 tests if any. Having a guy who is playing 100 tests means you don’t have any quality back ups pushing for that position. Richie McCaw may become the first New Zealander to play 100 tests because New Zealand doesn’t have any quality backups at openside flanker. But if they had a youngster just as good or better than McCaw reputation wouldn’t keep him in the team like in South Africa.
If New Zealand wins the world cup it wouldn’t be because of Graham Henry letting go of his rotation system it will be because New Zealand are the best team in world rugby like they’ve been for so many years. If the lose next year it will be a freak accident like in 2007.
hoesit almal net gou se n baie geseende kersfees en spoorvoedige 1102 go cheeeeeeeetaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhsssssss!!!!!!
8@ smallies72:
Hey… skoorsoekerige nuwerige jaar en gespeende kersfees vir jou en jou oranje kinders ook tjom… gooi mielies!
Users Online
Total 181 users including 0 member, 181 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,816,638 Page Impressions
_