One of the most anoying things in NZ is the tendency to doggedly bring people in high positions down if they made a mistake. They (the media) will just keep at it until the person (whether a coach, politician, ex-all black or any other type of executive) get’s sacked.

Haden is now a marked man and they will milk an apology and an confession that he made it up, has no proof and were wrong and then still keep at it until he gets his walking papers. They will then keep a tag on him and if he ever tries to do anything in the public sphere again the media will remind everyone of his indiscretion; making sure he does not get appointed for whatever role he applies.

Here is the latest in the Haden Saga.

The rugby race row shifted to the ethnicity of rugby ambassadors.

The Maori Party waded into the debate yesterday, calling on Andy Haden to resign over his “darkies” comment and questioning the lack of Maori among those named so far as Rugby World Cup ambassadors.

Former All Blacks captain Tana Umaga for instance was never approached – despite his pivotal role in bringing the 2011 World Cup to New Zealand.

Umaga, who is of Samoan descent, travelled to Dublin with former prime minister Helen Clark and former All Blacks great Colin Meads to put New Zealand’s case.

Jonah Lomu is the only player of Pacific Island descent named a rugby ambassador; the others are Haden, Sean Fitzpatrick, John Kirwan, David Kirk and Andrew Mehrtens.

Rugby World Cup Minister Murray McCully’s office confirmed yesterday that Umaga had not been approached.

It was considered that he was doing “more than enough for the country” with his current commitments, a spokesman for the minister said.

Questioned yesterday about the lack of Maori players on the list of ambassadors, Mr McCully implied that there would be some named down the track. “We are adding ambassadors as we go. If you hang around for a couple of weeks, you will see one or two more faces that you recognise quite well.”

Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples said the party greeted the decision to keep Haden on with sadness and “almost disgust”. All Blacks coach Graham Henry has also entered the fray, saying last night he was “disgusted” by claims that Pacific Island players were inferior to others.

Henry, in an interview with Campbell Live on TV3 tonight, made it clear where he stands on the whole thorny issue of racial attitudes and Polynesian stereotypes in the sport.

The All Blacks coach said he was disgusted by the comments that were being generated around Haden’s allegations and said he felt they had done New Zealand a “huge disservice”.

Henry, who has made extensive use of Polynesian players as captains of his All Blacks, described the row sparked by Haden’s allegations as narrow-minded and short-sighted and said much of the comment being generated was “absolute rubbish”.

“I think it’s absolute rubbish … If you look at the last long-term captain, that was Tana Umaga and Tana was also an outstanding young man who grew up as an All Black and had huge respect from his peers, and led them from the front.”

Warren Alcock, one of New Zealand’s leading player agents, has dismissed Andy Haden’s allegations that the Crusaders discriminate against Pacific Islanders.

Alcock had never heard of such a policy in 15 years dealing with the franchise.

“I have never, ever, heard the Crusaders, or Canterbury, ever mention race as an issue in relation to selection, recruitment or retention of players. Ever,” said Alcock, a highly influential rugby agent-manager who works for the New Zealand arm of Essentially Group.

“I have represented a significant number of Crusaders over the years and I am sure if there was any hint of anything Andy is talking about having any force, I would have heard something. It is not as though my involvement with the Crusaders is confined to one or two people. I deal with the whole hierarchy.”

Alcock is rated as one of the most powerful men in New Zealand sport, with Richie McCaw and Dan Carter among his clients.

Yesterday Haden admitted he had overstepped the mark by saying the Crusaders had a policy “in the manual and enshrined in their articles” but added: “Yes, [the policy is] set in stone and … that’s wrong but the principle remains and this is an issue for New Zealand rugby.”

However, Alcock, who said he had dealt with “everyone” at the Crusaders, from CEOs and coaches to players, said Haden’s comments should not be taken seriously.

“You expect Andy to say controversial things, I guess. When I read them I just thought, `That’s Andy’. If I was involved with the Crusaders in any form I would be disappointed with the comments.”

12 Responses to Is this tall poppy syndrome or what?

  • 1

    McLook

    Maybe no consolation but at least you guys have’nt got a tenth of the political inteference we’ve got over here. 🙁

  • 2

    @ Blouste: That is true but we’ve got heaps more PC here. Not sure which is worst. The teams are not affected by PC but general life is so full of it you want to “Luke Watson” at least once a month.

  • 3

    @ McLook:

    “…you want to “Luke Watson” at least once a month…”

    😆 Classic !!!

  • 4

    To me it looks like there is no difference between the head’s inside of Andy Haden and Schalck Burger.

  • 5

    @ dWeePer:

    😆

  • 6

    Ek vra weereens: wat is die verskil tussen ‘n Springbokspan wat uit ‘net blankes’ bestaan, en ‘n Maorispan wat uit ‘net Maori’s’ bestaan ?

  • 7

    6@ bdb:
    Die verskil is die 1 span is ‘n SA span en die ander ‘n NZ span….

  • 8

    I’m pretty sure Andy Haden would not have said something like this, if there wasnt substance to it….he has to be able to state his case and he might have to name names.
    Consider his service to All Black rugby…the mans b

  • 9

    what happened!!…..cont. the mans bona fides are in place.
    If anything the Maoris are creating a race issue by having a Maori team.

    But I am on record, that I’m ok with them doing that, the same as if any group of people wanted to create a team (as long as it isnt the National side) they should be allowed to for heavens sake!!!
    For example if SA Xhosa’s wanted to make a Xhosa team and play the Maori’s….well let them do it, what harm does it cause….nothing, only in peoples minds is it wrong, and if you as a Xhosa dont want to support that team, then that is also your right…..but imagine the emotive issue it woulde become, if they did it…..Its a stupid old world….we still havent learned to “live and let live”.

  • 10

    ok, I see I am talking to myself, everybody has buggered off.

  • 11

    @ 4man:I totally agree with you 4man as well as with bdb@6. The problem is SA is that it is only the Afrikaners who would be able to put forward a decent team and on what grounds are you an afrikaner; it has to be skin colour and mother tongue because if not both (skin colour and language) then coloureds should also be eligible to play for the team as well as they are predominantly afrikaans. Secondly what about white english speaking rugby players? Some have a father or a mother who is afrikaans but the home language is English.
    Now what about coloureds who can prove a white afrikaners within 8 generations in their family line? Such a person would in the NZ context qualify as a Moari (one Maori in the family line within 8 generations). Back to SA is that coloured then a coloured or an Afrikaner. Can he then play for both a coloured team and an Afrikaner team? Imagaine also the amount of far right junkies pitching up with their old transvaal and old SA flags singing the Stem and so forth at the rugby match.
    It is a can of worms and SA just don’t want to go there at this stage.

  • 12

    I think the NZ old players and rugby administration is doing their level best to jinx the World Cup next year. Should NZ again fail, political and race issues can be blamed. Excellent way of covering one’s bases.

Users Online

Total 115 users including 0 member, 115 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm