So for the first time this year the Bulls find themselves in a different position than the number 1 spot they have become accustomed to…

Position Team
(History)
  Ranking Points Last RPE
Movement
    This is pick & go’s new Super Rugby ranking table
which shows the ranking point positions of each
team since the first Super12 match in 1996.Each team started on 80 points and they move up
and down relative to each other using the same
points exchange system that the IRB use for
ranking Test matches.Exchange points are doubled for semis & finals.
1 Stormers SAF 86.5233 +1.7037
2 Bulls SAF 86.1036 +0.8946
3 Sharks SAF 82.4546 +0.3545
4 Waratahs AUS 81.7949 -1.7037
5 Crusaders NZL 81.7873 -0.8946
6 Hurricanes NZL 81.6235 -1.0982
7 Brumbies AUS 81.3077 -1.2055
8 Reds AUS 80.4260 +0.2551
9 Blues NZL 79.9979 +0.4113
10 Force AUS 78.2903 -0.3545
11 Cheetahs SAF 77.5349 0.0000
12 Chiefs NZL 76.2881 -0.4113
13 Highlanders NZL 75.4665 -0.2551
14 Lions SAF 70.4012 0.0000

21 Responses to S14 Rankings after semi’s according to IRB system

  • 1

    Hou ingedagte die Stormers het verlede week punte verdien teen die BULLS se B-spannetjie 😉

  • 2

    Eishhhhhhhhhhh!!

    Bulls will have to restore the natural order of things!!

  • 3

    Dit sal hierdie naweek gebeur !!! 😆

  • 4

    must say after this round i dont respect this rating, reason.

    We won against the Crusaders, i would have weighted that game more than the lowly Waratahs.

    Hope you understand the ranking of golf, then you will understand why i dont rate this one either.

  • 5

    ha ha ha! the lowly waratahs? they scored more points against you than the lowly crusaders! also, they ended higher up the log, and is ranked higher than the lowly crusaders. oh, and we didnt allow tries.

  • 6

    can someone please explain to me why cheatahs get zero points for creaming the lions. I know it’s no big accomplishment to beat the lions 🙂 but seriously guys, why 0 points for a win???

  • 7

    Hehe – Super jy bly ma ‘n rakker!! Nou druk daai blou skoentjie wat laas nog so lekker knus gepassit? Lyk my daai B-span was toe allie tyd ‘n bdb: byt die boudjie! 😉

  • 8

    Die eerste en laaste span kry nie maklik of baie punte nie…

    Kom ons kyk na die kompetisie wie le waar en oordeel dan…

  • 9

    7 @ fender:

    grapkas jy moet oplet. Die Bulle is in hierdie ranking verby gegaan in die laaste rondte.

    Nou na my mening is die Crusaders n baie beter span as die Waratahs. Kyk na hul geskiedenis en wat hulle bereik het. Nou hoekom die ranking sisteem hul(Crusaders) so laag rank weet ek nie, dit klink vir my verkeerd. Dit is al wat ek se, die sisteem is verdag. Dit maak in elk geval nie saak by my nie, ons kan 13de gerate wees solank ons Saterdag daai beker omhoog hou.

  • 10

    @ superBul:

    Die Bulle het punte verloor in die B-span game…

    Die manier is nie “flawless” nie maar die Tahs het bo die Saders geeindig op die log…

    Nie bereken in een game nie maar oor ‘n klomp.

    Ouens soos die Sharks wat ‘n span hoog op soos die Stormers geklap het het weer meer punte verdien.

    Werk soos alles in die lewe…maklik om bo te kom, moeiliker om bo te bly…

  • 11

    Why is the blue bulls all of a sudden no 2. This cant be rugby talk.

  • 12

    Brumbies, reds and blues better than the canes.

  • 13

    12 @ Wezwp:

    Of those teams you’ve mentioned, all of them as far as this year is concerned are equal, only one that are 2 points ahead …

    This log is calculated on a “recent form” type of thing…

    Thus the Sharks moving up so much, beating your mighty Stormers recently earning a lot of points, and also Stormers gaining valuable points against a top of the Log Bulls team that did sent their B-side so to say…
    The log does’nt provide for that.

    A 10th team beating a 2nd or 3rd team earns more points…Quite simple !!!

  • 14

    10 @ Blouste:
    If one look at Super History it is hard to see the Crusaders worth less than the Waratahs. But maybe it is just the positions for this year. But anyway i like this tipe of ratings and rankings and i have done a lot in my Provincial golf days. Will make a point to study this one.

    just have a look why i feel the way i feel.

    http://www.lassen.co.nz/s14det.php?teamnum=8#hrh
    http://www.lassen.co.nz/s14det.php?teamnum=4#hrh

  • 15

    @ Blouste:
    Last words on it
    http://www.lassen.co.nz/s14tab.php
    click on team name to go to full
    rankings history

  • 16

    @ superBul:

    True…

    Maar as jy kyk na Engeland se “rankings” in 2003 maak dit ook nie sin nie… As Bulle die naweek wen, dan sal die “log” ‘n “fair reflection” wees.

    Die “log” weerspieel vorm…

  • 17

    @ superBul:

    Hierdie is die “full ranking history” volgens IRB sisteem…

    Blameer die sisteem, maar dan was NZ seker ook nie die laaste paar jaar waardige nr. 1 op die wereld ranglys nie…, behalwe vir ‘n week of 2 dink ek die weergawe is redelik akkuraat t.o.v. vorm van spanne huidiglik…

  • 18

    Kyk jy krieket, jis die skare kan catch

  • 19

    Sammy slaan die rook uit ons

  • 20

    Vyftigtal van 20 balle

  • 21

    56 van 21 balle

Users Online

Total 62 users including 0 member, 62 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm