A four week suspension is what Bakkies received after his hearing as we all read on a previous thread. Is it fair ? Look at the footage and read further on the rule that was applicable…

Citing Commissioner Freek Burger cited Botha under Law 10.4 (h) for dangerously and recklessly entering a ruck without using his arms or grasping a player. Botha made contact with Stormers right wing Gio Aplon in the second minute of the match.

I for one clearly see his arm making contact with the player basicly simultaneously as the rest of his body or head. Also what about he Stormer player entering the ruck just a split second after Bakkies ? I don’t see much of a difference. Surely Bakkies entered from the side and was rightly penalised. A 4 week suspension, you decide…

I’ve added another clean by Bakkies to draw comparisons for those who would be interested.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPEYtII2qgw[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJ0_L9EjdCk&feature=related[/youtube]

282 Responses to Is Bakkies suspension fair…

  • 181

    sharky_forever_till_i_support_the_stormers_forever @ 177
    my initial reaction was that bakkies deserved to be carded
    if he was, he most propably wouldve be playing this coming weekend!!
    slip-up from the refs there!!

  • 182

    @ 175 – Ash

    Wat is “veiligheidspolisie”… Was al die polisie nie nog altyd veilig nie, net deesdae nie !!! 😆

  • 183

    well to me he is guilty of dangerous and reckless play

    not guilty of not having used his arms

    guilty of leading the tackle with his head 😆

  • 184

    ashley agree on the bakkies point 😆 the support the stormmoffies dis n hell fucking never 😆

  • 185

    Ok manne ek is eers weg.

    Sal later terug kom en loer en dalk ook The Saint se outobiografie kom lees 😆

    Cheers almal !!!

  • 186

    @ 183

    Maybe, Fact is that was not the charge !!!

  • 187

    @sharky…. Who did that? I did not post that….. lol

    But must say it is funny

  • 188

    cheers blouste

  • 189

    sharky @ 184
    lol

  • 190

    lol was me DB will change it hehehee

  • 191

    The question is not “was Bakkies’ suspension fair”; the question should be “was the suspension applied correctly” and the answer is yes. In this instance Bakkies is a repeat offender and he was suspended previously for 2 weeks (the minimum), no ways will any new offence be less penalisable. The judge must go for equal or more and if the offender is a repeat offender the judge will go for the harsher penalty. This is a no brainer. Future rucking of this kind will cause harsher suspensions for Bakkies.

    Shadow took the player past the horisontal and then continue to delibarately trying to bury him, thus he is guilty.

    Franks didn’t take Danie through the horisontal and he didn’t try to bury him, therefore not guilty, but very borderline. I think Franks was lucky.

    But to say that all officials and refs are against the Bulls, really silly.

  • 192

    He he he Sharky

    Dink net as ek ou Saint se laaste post so bietjie edit !!! 😆

  • 193

    ashley go check DB’s post on the bakkies gets 4 weeks thread 😆

    before i change it hehehehehehehe

  • 194

    Ok

    Bye !!!

  • 195

    @ sharkey….lol funny man…very funny 🙂

  • 196

    😆 bloutse

    i thought it fitted right in with bd’s anger at the time 😆

  • 197

    here is his post lol

    Durban Bulle

    May 18th, 2010 at 1:49 PM
    this is a joke…. blaauw did the same thing in the same match and the same ruck….. But nothing…….. Bunch of fairy boys….. Go play and watch soccer……

    I am so angry now justice 4 bakkies…. We dont need him for the semi and final but it cant go on like this every freakin season the same thing ban our players for things that was done the whole season and not even a penalty……..

    JUSTICE 4 BAKKIES
    JUSTICE 4 BULLS
    JUSTICE
    JUSTICE
    JUSTICE is all we want!!!!!!!!

    I will sommer trek my draad i am so kwaad

    Edit

  • 198

    DB good on ya for being a great sport mate ^5

  • 199

    Sharky Durban Bulle is not funny, he is childish, let him go wanking.

  • 200

    i was very upset when i was typing that post……lol but actually its not that big for the bulls… We played great with the other guys…we will still take this cup!!!!!!

  • 201

    mwah boerboel……. Blaauw and other players are facts…… Bakkies has got a diff set of rules at the moment

  • 202

    boerboel @ 191
    amen!!
    and
    well said!!

  • 203

    funny how the citings only start around final time as well…………

  • 204

    look no doubt if its a bulls stormer final its gonna be one heck of a game

  • 205

    uhm relax peeps , the games this weekend is not bulls and stormers , you can have a full go at each other newxt week 😉 😆

  • 206

    yeah cant for the semis and final….

  • 207

    sharky @ 205
    😀 if we BOTH make it!!

  • 208

    lol true ashwee

  • 209

    @ashley….we will…

  • 210

    julle twee kan bly wees die sharks is nie in die semi’s nie , julle sou geskyt het , bakstene se ek julle 😆

Users Online

Total 35 users including 0 member, 35 guests, 0 bot online

Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm