41 Responses to Rugby-Talk Team of week 7

• 

  31

  Morné on 29 March 2010 at 10:37 am

  Super,

  If that is how we must do it then sure, I can do that.

  The link between ‘form’ and team however throws me and puts me off picking guys who did not have good form to start with.

  But if we had to pick the best of the lot regardless I suppose we could do that.

  My revised team will then look like this…

  1. Guthro
  2. Bismarck
  3. Kruger
  4. Danie
  5. Victor
  6. Botes
  7. Minnie
  8. Spies
  9. Ruan
  10. Morne
  11. Hougaard
  12. Swanepoel
  13. Walter Venter
  14. Basson
  15. Lambie
• 

  32

  Puma on 29 March 2010 at 10:42 am

  15 – Lambie (another really good game from the younster)
  14 – Pekeur
  13 – Venter
  12 – Swannie
  11 – Hougaard
  10 – Morne (never had a great game, but here was no-one else except Ruan but cant choose him twice)
  9 – Ruan
  8 – Spies
  7 – Minnie
  6 – Botes (best game I have seen him play this S14)
  5 – Victor (not his best game but no-one else)
  4 – Flip
  3 – Kruger
  2 – Bissy
  1 – Steenkamp / John very close 2nd.

  Okay had to think hard about some positions as not all played really well this past weekend.
• 

  33

  Puma on 29 March 2010 at 10:43 am

  32 – The G on my keyboard don’t work proper….hahaha. Have to hit down hard.

  youngster..hehehe.
• 

  34

  superBul on 29 March 2010 at 10:53 am

  31
  Morne it is impossible to take this as a true barometer. It is the view of us here, the few bloggers here that bothers to pick a team. We need a balanced selection panel consisting of equal numbers of every side and then the rest. Like we started off.

  On News 24 the pick % is given, you dont know from where the picks came or how many was given to each player. Still its fun. And gives you a reasonable idea who the people want in their teams.

  This week without the Stormers had a big impact, next week without the Lions a smaller impact on the team picked.
• 

  35

  grootblousmile on 29 March 2010 at 11:24 am

  Hellooooooooooooooo

  I see I’m rapidly approaching 10000 comments, only 15 to go…. and I see that our own serial blogger, Puma, has gone past 7000 comments yesterday…. well done old timer!
• 

  36

  Onerb on 29 March 2010 at 12:03 pm

  Hoeveel comments het ek al GBS?
• 

  37

  Ashley on 29 March 2010 at 12:21 pm

  onerb @ 35
  ag nie te veel nie!! 😉

  gbs @ 35
  hmmmm, wonder hoeveel van daai comments was rugby related, lol
• 

  38

  grootblousmile on 29 March 2010 at 1:06 pm

  37@ Asbak – 70% meer as joune… hoeveel van jou comments is grappies… 70%??
• 

  39

  grootblousmile on 29 March 2010 at 1:09 pm

  36@ Onerb – 370. Jy lê in die 33ste plek
• 

  40

  dWeePer on 29 March 2010 at 1:21 pm

  I see some bloggers get confused in selecting a list of performers and then calls it a team. That is one of the reasons why I do not attempt to select a team of performers.

  Some years ago a read a book written by Danie Craven. In that book he provide some guidelines how to select a team. He started of by identifying footballers and performers. Footballers are the players you select and performers you ignore.

  Thus to select a team of performers is a fruitless exercise.
• 

  41

  superBul on 29 March 2010 at 4:53 pm

  40
  Now put your money where your mouth is pick it , we would love to see what you end up with.