This is the question on the lips of many, jus who should play No 8 for the Bokke?
In South Africa the debate is still continuing over who is our premier No 8.
Obviously everyone has their favourite when it comes to the player that should be the link between the forwards and the backs, but let’s compare the candidates.
In the past few months Willem Alberts, Duanne Vermeulen, Ryan Kankowski and Pierre Spies have been mentioned as our best No 8’s. Let’s look at them critically and objectively and consider their weak and strong points, if starting in the current Bokke set-up.
Willem Alberts:
The Lions No 8 has been playing good rugby during the Curry Cup and has performed well over the past 12 months or so. Playing in a struggling Lions team Alberts is often used to get his team over the advantage line.
The old Monnas boykie is a strong, powerfull ball carrier who carries two or three defenders with him over the the advantage line. From 5m out, Alberts is very difficult to stop. Being so big and strong makes Alberts win collisions as well.
However, Alberts might just be too slow to be a modern No 8. At Test level rugby is played at the quickest pace and at least one loose forward needs to be as quick as the backs. With Brussouw and Juan Smith playing at 6 and 7 respectively, the Bokke need a pacy No 8. (Brussouw and Smith are both excellent players and have their own fine qualities, but they are not really known to be the quickest around the park. Yes, they are quick enough to run 15m to the next ruck, but often we see Spies, Bakkies, Matfield or Bekker get to the ball first when when a ball is kicked through).
Thus, Alberts won’t fit in the set-up when Brussouw and Smith plays. Also, Alberts is not competitive enough in the line-outs and our Bokke place huge emphasizes on competing in the line-out, from front to back.
Duanne Vermeulen:
The Western Province loose forward has recently made a move from Bloemfontein to the Cape. At the Cheetahs Vermeulen had often been used as No 8, however, since Vermeulen made the move to WP, he has been playing at blindside flank.
Vermeulen likes his rugby hard and tough. He provides the grunt WP needs since they prefer to play the “fetcher” (Luke Watson) at the back of the scrum. Vermeulen is a strong ball carrier and get through loads of work around the field. He doesn’t mind taking contact and often wins the collisions. He can be used as a strong line-out option at the back of the line-out. He also makes turnovers every now and then.
He has been playing consistently good rugby the past few years, although he has been injured for the first part of the CC.
With Duanne Vermeulen not getting game-time at No 8 it’s difficult to compare him to the other No 8’s objectively. He did well when playing at the back of the scrum at the Cheetahs, but that was almost a year ago. Can we still judge him on that performance?
Although he is a strong line-out option, he doesn’t compete enough on opposing ball. Like Alberts, Vermeulen is not nearly as quick as Kanko or Spies around the field. We need a quick No 8, no question.
Vermeulen is a solid option, and won’t let you down, but he does not seem to have that elusive X-factor.
Ryan Kankowski:
The debate between who is better, between Kanko and Spies have been continuing for years now. This is probably due to the fact that they are the same “type” of player.
Kankowski has been playing behind Spies in the pecking order during the past year and has mostly warmed the Bokke bench.
When he’s had his chance at Test level before, he has done little to prove that he is better than Spies.
He is playing good rugby at the Sharks, during the CC. Kanko is an explosive runner and his speed is his strong point. He often out-runs the backs and has been involved in many tries, running like a wing.
Kanko is a tall, lean and pacy No 8 who can side-step and he is often used as a 8th backline player. He is also a decent line-out option and quick to pick up and make a run from the back of the scrum.
Although Kanko is tall, he is not the strongest No 8 out there. When the game gets tight he often disappears and he definately prefers an open game. When playing against a strong pack of forwards he struggles to cross the advantage line and is often tackled backwards.
In short, he is a poor man’s Spies.
Pierre Spies:
Pierre Spies has all the attributes which it takes to be the best No 8 in the world. His old coach Heyneke Meyer called him a “frats” (freak), due to the fact that he runs as quick as the fastest backline players, bench presses as much as props and jumps a high as locks.
Spies is our current premier No 8 and would’ve had a World Cup medal, had he not missed the tournament through illness.
So what makes Spies the best?
Spies is an explosive runner like Kankowski and as quick as any back out there. In addition, Spies is strong and gets his team over the advantage line with great success. He is a strong and solid line-out option and has stolen many balls from opposing line-outs.
Give Spies enough space and he will run you ragged. What makes Spies better is the way he reacts in broken play. We often see a wing or centre break through our defence or kick a ball through… who’s behind and covering – Spies. He’s often the first or only one there to save the day. We see the same thing on attack when the opponents have to run back to save a try. Spies will often be there first to make the tackle. With Brussouw and Smith not that quick, we need Spies in the Bokke team.
His obvious weak points lie in 2 factors, his defence and his ability to control ball at the back of a scrum. He often misses the first tackle, something he has obviously worked hard on because it seems to be improving. A classic No 8 has “golden hands” and behind the scrum, he is not always up to scratch. In addition, Pierre is rumoured to disappear in tight games, which has lately proved to be a fallacy.
Spies has that elusive X-factor which makes him special. (I’ve included a link at the bottom which proves why he is feared with his X-factor.) Some believe that Spies is as close as we will get to the perfect No 8.
Playing with Fourie Du Preez regularly at the Bulls, they have a good understanding. Spies, du Preez and Steyn has proved themselves as a winning combination.
@SA Barbarians –
Like Pietman that matured into a Bull!
En soos ek daar genoem het, die res het almal al of wil graag vir die WP speel.
@Supa Die Bloubul – I don’t want to insult your friends, but any idiot can accidentally make a right call once in a lifetime
@sharky_forever –
Exactly Sharky. I wouldnt be able to change teams. So everytime you move you get a different team? That wouldnt work for my Bulls memorobilia collection..hehe
@Supa Die Bloubul – He’s only temporary pissed off, that’s all 🙂
@SA Barbarians –
I wouldnt call Pietman an idiot, but yes, he made the right choice.
Just a quickie – night GBS – Blik en myself nrt slrg kan gedra?……. (You might ban me!)!
Irish – Hi Mate, fizz flowing here, highlights on great moment to win The Ashes, the most special thing in English Cricket!
Boys – goodnight and have a great week.
As for Rugby Talk – have another good fun week, enjoy the new bloggers and GO BOKKE on Saturday!!
@Supa Die Bloubul –
Wel, Joost het net ‘n Bul gebly omdat die ander provinsies se girls te “classy” vir hom was. 😈
@KingPaul – KP, waaraan skryf jy hierdie mentaliteit toe, dat sekere noordelike mense so ‘n obsessie het om die WP te gangbang?
Moontlik al die jare se swaarkry?
@KingPaul –
Ja, dis nogal ongelooflik dat die top 2 driekdrukkers in Bok geskiedenis altwee dit gedoen het toe hulle by die Bulle onder kontrak was.
@KingPaul – en 7 van daai het vanaf 100 % tot omtrent 75% van hull loopbanne vir natal gespeel 😉
jouba natal, was nooin n bok in bloem nie
andrews natal
small 95 % time at sharks when a bok
andre snyman 70 % time at sharks but also at bulls
jpp natal
stefan terrblanche natal
percy probably 60natal 40 wp
i could add like you skinstandt as he finnished his bok career whilst at the sharks , but to me thats not fair as it was only 1 and a half seasons
@carol – Night Lady C
@KingPaul –
Soos Dawn en Lilith? Ja, baie classy! 😯
@SA Barbarians –
Wel, dis al kicks wat hulle uit die lewe kry. As jy in Tswane gewoon het sou jy dit beter verstaan het….
@carol –
Goodnight!
@KingPaul –
As hy in Tswane gewoon het was hy self n Bul!
@KingPaul – Ja, jy is reg. Onthou jy hoe die galgtoue gedurende die 2008 S14 aan die jakarandas in Tswane gehang het? Toe wou almal weer vir FL gangbang.
Eish
@Supa Die Bloubul – Hoe classy was sy nuutste Tswane avontuurtjie? 🙂
ONCE A SHARKS ALWAYS A SHARK , ITS BLACK AND WHITE AND NOTHING INBETWEEN
😆
@sharky_forever –
Same here with the BULLS ofcourse!! No changing of teams every few years. Dis lekker om n Bul te wees! 😆
@SA Barbarians –
Baie meer classy as Dawn en Lilith. 😉
@sharky_forever – I respect that Sharky. Life would be boring if we all supported the same team
@SA Barbarians – 287
hhehehe
Ek onthou goed! Hier is ‘n paar stoere Bul supporters hier in ons midde wat omtrent petrol gebedel het om vir ou FL te gaan uitbrand. En Pieter Rossouw was net so ongewild!
Praat van Pieter Rossouw, weet jy dat hy nog steeds in Stellenbosch bly en heen en weer vlieg om die Bulls te gaan afrig?
😉@Supa Die Bloubul –
Goeie naand aan al die mense…en bulle
🙂
@SA Barbarians –
Soos almal Rassie wou hang in Maart?
@Supa Die Bloubul – Oooo jammer, ek het nie geweet jy ken al drie intiem nie.
@SA Barbarians – amen
i just prefer to keep supporting the men while sadly my friend 😆 you have gone into supporting broke back mountain 😯 😯 😆 joking boet
Die nuus oor Jacque Fourie was meer exiting…
MAAR
As dit beteken dat Nakalakikaki se dae getel is, break out the champagne
@KingPaul – Ja, kan PR nie kwalik neem dat hy nie in Tswane wil woon nie. Die man het eenvoudig te veel kultuur vir daai geweste 🙂
Users Online
Total 80 users including 0 member, 80 guests, 0 bot online
Most users ever online were 3735, on 31 August 2022 @ 6:23 pm
No Counter as from 31 October 2009: 41,845,081 Page Impressions
_